EA is starting to get on my nerves, help me out

[Naphtali]

You would think having exclusive nfl rights, EA would have a player or x players to break down film and give them more acurate based opinions on what the ratings should be, but they have not.
I was iritated when I saw Brady had arm power of 99, as anyone who's an educated fan know's he gets his velocity from stepping up into the pockett not pure arm strength, how can he be higher than cutler, or Jamarcus, simply because of the year he had or the 5 yard running start throw at the end of the super bowl. Peyton is often fading back and arching on his toes throws the ball with great accuracy and velocity.
Now I've senn Brandon Jacobs the big power back with a speed of 90??....?? Asante samuel with Man coverage of 93, when he played in a zone system in New england.

Somthing else that's bothering me about madden is, is it just me or are there too many ratings if a receiver has a catch rating of 94, is it really neccessary to have aTough catch in traffic rating, and spectacular catch rating, I mean doesn't he already have a toughness rating and a strength and ball carrier rating, all these ratings are becoming a little ridiculous.

RLS (release from bump rating) why is this neccessary for receiver to have, cant you just go by strength, acc, agility and his weight and size.

Linemen, does there strength and acc rating dictate the other Position specific ratings line Power move and finese move.

How big a deal is it for OL in to have a high Pass Pro footwork rating, is it dictated by speed and agility, say higher agility mean footwork will be easier to develop for OL player X.
IF a Lb or DL has a a str over 90 does it make him a better block shedder?
Why do I need a stiffarm rating, again if his strength is higher than the tackler's, has longer reach and higher BTK rating and I time the stiffarm right, why do I need a rating for it.
I felt some new ratings were needed, but Im not sure about the way EA has done it.

Someone who plays next generation madden help me out, do all these ratings make the game overly scientific?

[-=Epic=-]

Well for the Bradys rediculess arm strength i think that is an overrated move on the game designers part, Bradys got a good arm but he aint a Favre, Russel, or Rothesburger (spl? xD)

Asante's man coverage rating could be derived on how well he played zone coverage, although different style you could derive how well he could be in man coverage by watching him in zone. although it doesnt work with everyone, but its a threoy.

[Raidersabc123]

All the diffrent types of ratings are great it makes each player fill diffrent so I dont know what your complaining about its great

[Naphtali]

Can you give a longer explanation please

[or24]

I personally liked the current gen ratings and attributes(ps2 and xbox). all the new attributes on 360 are unnecessary imo. Some players were rated way too high. Eli(one of the worst reg. season qb's) got a 93 overall. Garrard got a 92. Very undeserving. Even Kelly, Howard, and Morrison(who all got 91's) were rated too high, but I'm not complaining about them

[or24]

They also said the ratings weren't finalized so some could still change.