Grade your offseason - Page 2 - Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board

**madstork** · #16 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

Well, it could be better..but it could be a lot worse.

We let go a small, undersized disruption in Lloyd.
Let go Carter, our pass rusher who doesn't pass rush.
We lost Petersen, who I would have liked to keep, who, since his injury has not played anywhere near his previous level. "Hawks vastly overpaid.
And we let Fred Beaseley go, who was benched early last season, and knew he was on the way out.

We added Larry Allen, who is now our left guard, playing between Jonas Jennings, a very good tackle, and arguably the best center in the league (when healthy) Newberry. Signing Allen let Smiley go back to his position at right guard. Heitman and Bass are both backup guards and backup center.
Hmmm..it appears our line just went to quite respectable, doesn't it?

We also signed WR's Antonio Bryant, and Bryan Gilmore, improving over the departed Lloyd.

Signed CB Walt Harris from Washington.

Have 11 picks in the upcoming draft, that is fat with WR's and defense. Not bad so far.

Let me see what the Raiders have done, so far.

Hmmm..Brooks signed, who was benched by the Saints.

Tyrone Poole, cb, from NE.

Starks, cb, from NE.

Lost your nose tackle Washington.
Lost DB Hill.

Well..what say you?

Wouldn't exactly say that you guys are filling any holes, would you?

I know..ABC..anybody but Collins for your qb..but is that what you're reduced to? "it's better..oh well"?

Starks?? the walking bandaid? gets hurt shaving?

Whew..looks like you guys are hoping for a windfall of draft picks that will just step right in and contribute.

You are a ball buster! I won't comment on the Niners, but I love your assessment of Brooks: "benched by the Saints". Classic! I guess the fact that he has thrown 124 TDs vs. 84 ints doesn't mean anything? First Saints QB to win a playoff game? Winning record as a starter until '05 season, which was a disaster for the whole organization, not just him? Not making him out to be Peyton Manning, but he's pretty good. According to numerous media reports, Davis has always coveted him, and he got him dirt cheap after other teams tripped over each other for the likes of McCown and Ramsey. Pretty smart move, and now they have the best QB in the bay hands down. But that's not saying much since that was true of Collins last year too.

macc_attack · #17 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

Hill HAD THE MOST TACKLES ON YOUR TEAM..

hummm...lets see about that, Kirk morrison actually led the team in tackles with 116, then came danny clark with 113. Renaldo Hill had 89, not exactly the most.

In your own words:

"Next time just say "I don't know." that would save us both the time and energy, don't you think?"

EasyRaider · #18 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 02:49 PM

+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+
| Name | G | CMP ATT PCT YARD Y/A TD IN | RSH YARD TD |
+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+
| Ken Dorsey | 3 | 48 90 53.3 481 5.3 2 2 | 4 11 0 |
| Cody Pickett | 5 | 14 35 40.0 140 4.0 0 2 | 13 42 0 |
| Tim Rattay | 4 | 56 97 57.7 667 6.9 5 6 | 7 18 0 |
| Alex Smith | 9 | 84 165 50.9 875 5.3 1 11 | 30 103 0 |

Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+
| Kevan Barlow | 12 | 176 581 3.3 3 | 31 241 7.8 0 |
| Fred Beasley | 9 | 0 0 0.0 0 | 2 12 6.0 0 |
| Frank Gore | 14 | 127 608 4.8 3 | 15 131 8.7 0 |
| Chris Hetherington | 16 | 1 3 3.0 0 | 5 26 5.2 0 |
| Maurice Hicks | 14 | 59 308 5.2 3 | 12 47 3.9 0 |
| Terry Jackson | 16 | 2 11 5.5 0 | 10 67 6.7 0 |
+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

17 total tds

Kerry Collins threw for more than that. And I guarantee Brooks throws for more than the whiners score next season

OMFG when will you just STFU!!!!!

**MadtownRaider** · #19 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 02:53 PM

Walt Harris LOLOLOLOL, did he ever cut the braids?

Anyway your going to need more than that if your going to get more than one win.

Come back around in Sept!

Mike-49er · #20 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by macc_attack

hummm...lets see about that, Kirk morrison actually led the team in tackles with 116, then came danny clark with 113. Renaldo Hill had 89, not exactly the most.

In your own words:

"Next time just say "I don't know." that would save us both the time and energy, don't you think?"

You are so correct. My bad..I should have said D-backs.
In that case..."I don't know"

Mike-49er · #21 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadtownRaider

Walt Harris LOLOLOLOL, did he ever cut the braids?

Anyway your going to need more than that if your going to get more than one win.

Come back around in Sept!

I'm sorry, but you seemed to have not read the rules.

It states in rule 7c. Any team that signs Duane Starks, who's missed 26 games in the last 4 years, including ALL of '03 may not laugh at any choices any other team makes.

Squirrley rule, but one, none the less.

Of course, that rule is not to be confused with rule 7d, which states ANY team that hires Starks AND Tyrone Poole, who ALSO MISSED 26 GAMES..but in his case did it in the last TWO YEARS, not only may not laugh at any other teams choices, but should pay a fee.

Hey..you brought it up, so, lol...I mean...STARKS?? POOLE?? and you laugh at Harris? Good one.

RaiderSithLord · #22 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 04:24 PM

Theres more coming....

L.A. Raiderfan · #23 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 07:22 PM

49ers off-season needs:
QB
RB
FB
WR
WR
TE
LT
LG
C
RG
RT

LE
RE
NT
LOLB
MLB
ILB
ROLB
CB
CB
FS
SS

K
P

Good luck Mike!

EasyRaider · #24 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

Hey..you brought it up, so, lol...I mean...STARKS?? POOLE?? and you laugh at Harris? Good one.

Starks, Poole for the Raiders = depth

Harris for the niners = answer to your defensive problems?

Antonio Bryant....wasn't he let go because he was a headcase like TO but not as talented?

make some sense when you post please especially when criticizing.

EasyRaider · #25 (**permalink**) 03-29-2006, 11:47 PM

Ladies and Gentlemen I give you your San Francisco 49ers:

Mike-49er · #26 (**permalink**) 03-30-2006, 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Raiderfan

49ers off-season needs:
QB
RB
FB
WR
WR
TE
LT
LG
C
RG
RT

LE
RE
NT
LOLB
MLB
ILB
ROLB
CB
CB
FS
SS

K
P

Good luck Mike!

HEEEEYYYYY??? What are you talking about??

We signed Nedney. (you know, the guy you guys let go for that side of beef called JanoShankski..WIDE RIGHT.)

So scratch K off of there.

Mike-49er · #27 (**permalink**) 03-30-2006, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EasyRaider

Starks, Poole for the Raiders = depth

Harris for the niners = answer to your defensive problems?

Antonio Bryant....wasn't he let go because he was a headcase like TO but not as talented?

make some sense when you post please especially when criticizing.

Excuse me..but you sound confused.
Harris is depth for the Niners. Who the hell said he's starting?

Starks and Poole are a joke. Depth? lol..they suck, and they are always injured.

Yeah, Bryant's not as talented as TO. No one is. Guess we'll just take our chances.

Now..back to the fact that so far, the Raiders have been either dead last in off season activity, or close to it. For a team that was one of the absolute worst in the AFC you would think something besides guys that have ended last year ON THE BENCH would be nice? lol..then again..

EasyRaider · #28 (**permalink**) 03-30-2006, 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

Now..back to the fact that so far, the Raiders have been either dead last in off season activity, or close to it. For a team that was one of the absolute worst in the AFC you would think something besides guys that have ended last year ON THE BENCH would be nice? lol..then again..

Never knew there was a ranking system on off season transactions or is it the fact that this is how deep you must dig to try and prove to yourself that your team is better than the raiders? Stop now before you really look like the ass that you see every day in the mirror... well it might be to late for that. Come on I can see this type of banter coming from a team that has not won a superbowl but really , think how pathetic you must look to the other whiner fans out there, on second thought you said they kicked you out of that forum also right? Its to late for that to.

Oh well I guess its a free forum so you can stay as long as you follow the rules right? Keep digging up all these trivial numbers and theories just so you can tell your self "we really aren't in that bad a shape if you think of it this way". Oh and how many of your quarterbacks rode the bench last year or was that the organizations intentions...to play Musical QB's?

**TheRaid IsOn** · #29 (**permalink**) 03-30-2006, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

I sometimes get headaches when I'm too 'profound'.

It's a burden I bear.

Like you figuring out the meanings of "dike" and "dyke".

it was merely word play on your name.. ya know Mike..Dike, niner Mike..whiner dike ..I expected it to go over your head though bro... you never let me down !!! hahahaha

**stork44** · #30 (**permalink**) 03-30-2006, 07:34 AM

Wow...looks like Mikey forgot to take his butt-plug out again!