How do you "measure" up?

[Mike-49er]

Originally Posted by cad

hurry up Mikey im waiting for your pathetic comebacks, answer UC's question and reply on mine, what do u have to said whiner boy

YOU NEED TO TAKE THE TIME AND READ...I replied to this ABOVE "lol..since 2000? where the hell did you come up with THAT year? Let me guess...does 99 mean we win? I assume you checked..must mean the raiders squeaked ahead IF we only go to 2000."

I'm NOT going to keep holding your hand on this.

I'm a busy man..places to go..things to do..people to smack on.

[cad]

"whos our QB?" ummmm Walter didnt start this seaon so maby u should rephrase that

and besides Smith is no manning lol!!

[cad]

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

YOU NEED TO TAKE THE TIME AND READ...I replied to this ABOVE "lol..since 2000? where the hell did you come up with THAT year? Let me guess...does 99 mean we win? I assume you checked..must mean the raiders squeaked ahead IF we only go to 2000."

I'm NOT going to keep holding your hand on this.

I'm a busy man..places to go..things to do..people to smack on.

lol! what places u live here u sad mofo lol!! come back PLEASE!!!! I WANT TO BE ENTERTAINED!!!!LOL!!!!!

[cad]

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

YOU NEED TO TAKE THE TIME AND READ...I replied to this ABOVE "lol..since 2000? where the hell did you come up with THAT year? Let me guess...does 99 mean we win? I assume you checked..must mean the raiders squeaked ahead IF we only go to 2000."

I'm NOT going to keep holding your hand on this.

I'm a busy man..places to go..things to do..people to smack on.

so what makes 79 so significant, all that matters is that we KICK YOUR ASS IN SERIES WINS SUCKA!!!!! belive that

[cad]

lol!!! HE gets his ass kick even in college


a very wise investment lol!!! 49ers blow and dont expect to get any better because both your best Lbs are outta there and we will most likely pick one up

49ers defence-yards allowed, 399.5

49ers offence-total yards-212

LOL!!!! HAHAHAH WHAT A JOKE

[cad]

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/live/NFL_20050918_SF@PHI

notice how detmer is 9/9!!!!LOL HAHAH!!! should have traded for him instead of getting 3 pick boy lol!! that is pathetic

[UC]

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

lol..since 2000? where the hell did you come up with THAT year? Let me guess...does 99 mean we win? I assume you checked..must mean the raiders squeaked ahead IF we only go to 2000.

Now..in reality it's actually not me that only wants to go back a quarter century, it's obviously the writers design. Is that when ESPN started? 79? No idea..maybe. Again, have NO idea why they went back to 79.

Ok..here's another stat..SINCE the Raiders have been in the Super Bowl..how has each team done?

Like I thought. You are unable to answer any question directly. I picked 2000 because it was the start of a new decade. Is it too recent for your liking? Oh, but a quarter century is proof enough, a half a century is too much, but 5 years is definetly giving us the edge. Suck a weiner dude! You are so biased where 25 years is justified, 40 years is too much and five years is too little. But, ESPN reported it UC....

What did you tell me when I posted a site? I referenced it and take responsibility for it. Maybe you should too instead of running under ESPN's skirt. You are pathetic. Cheap entertainment you are, is your mother a stripper? Must be in the jeans, I mean "genes"

[cad]

Originally Posted by UCRaider

Like I thought. You are unable to answer any question directly. I picked 2000 because it was the start of a new decade. Is it too recent for your liking? Oh, but a quarter century is proof enough, a half a century is too much, but 5 years is definetly giving us the edge. Suck a weiner dude! You are so biased where 25 years is justified, 40 years is too much and five years is too little. But, ESPN reported it UC....

What did you tell me when I posted a site? I referenced it and take responsibility for it. Maybe you should too instead of running under ESPN's skirt. You are pathetic. Cheap entertainment you are, is your mother a stripper? Must be in the jeans, I mean "genes"

exactly

[AW71]

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...0/nflstandings
Well, if one is to go back to 1979..which team to you think is atop the NFL?? Any guesses? Go ahead..take a wild ass guess.


Amazing, isn't it? Considering our last few years..we're STILL on top?

Chew on that for a while, Raider fans.

After the way you guys finished this year, you wanna come out with that? Pathetic, at best....

[RaiderOfTheSith]

Originally Posted by Mike-49er

Wrong. You received permission, and then, and only then did you feel competant enough to post. You failed miserably, but at least you felt you stood a chance. Don't give up, grasshopper

I failed Gay-Mike??? I guess opinions are like @ssholes, you're glad everybody has one for your enjoyment.

Ah..another idiot grade school take by someone all giddy that they feel "clever". Weakass **** is becoming the norm for many of you wannabee's.

whatever gay-mike. Like this is you "bringing" it.

Ourward appearances don't guarantee you're too stupid for words, but they don't indicate you aren't either. Now, this is the THIRD time I've stated this. I posted a link from a ESPN page..now..are you confused? Do you understand what that means? Means..for the third time..I DIDN'T WRITE IT..now, feel free to ask anyone what those words mean, because I assume you can comprehend..prove it. Now, slow to digest things..how damn stupid is it of you to state I would start it in a year we were 2-14? Pretty damn stupid if you ask me.

Yes you posted a ink that someone else wrote, are you not saying you are adopting the viewpoint? Or are you one of those Scarlett o'hara SanFransicans that put thier hand to their forehead and say "don't blame me, I didn't write it." Quite the nice double-take acting from a SF drag. And to complete your fantasy - I don't give a d@mn. As for the 2-14 issue, when you posted the article and touted the results you adopted it as your own point of view. Live with it bcause its starts 2-14 and take the heat you will get (heat as in razing from Raider fans, not Ben-gay heat).

About as dumb a take as you could formulate. Seriously..that was sorry. "uh..duh..writer gave you ammo". You ever hear of the edit button? Means after you post, and you read what you post, and after you cringe, you can go and change it before someone laughs at you. Guess you missed that part. Too late...laughing at your sorryass for that one, lol...BIG TIME. 70's and 80's?? lol..why just then? Hell do 80's and 90's..should be a major laugh at the ineptitude of the Raiders. Face it..what your saying is you wish to discuss THE SIXTIES AND SEVENTIES.

I think your brains are in your @ss and a peter poke you in the brain from the rear and caused damage. I talked about the 70's and the 80s in the end, which overlaps the time frames of the article that you posted.

As I already stated..how sorry is it that some Raider fans want to discuss FOUR AND FIVE DECADES AGO..half a CENTURY.. Here's a little tidbit for you..for the last two and half decades..the Niners are AHEAD OF EVERYONE..read again..for the LAST QUARTER OF A CENTURY THE NINERS ARE KICKING YOUR ASS..lol..can you count that high?

as for the numbers from 1960 and 1963. Nut butter gay-Mike ... the Raiders franchise started in 1960, I gave you that we were #2 since the day the raiders were "born". I gave you the stat from 1963 because that is when Al first came to the Raiders, where we are #1 in the NFL and both STATS are not decades old, becuase the run through till TODAY. Go back and give SF stats from the beginning ... unless you dont have time and have to get ready for dress rehearsal today.

oh..who's your coach again?
qb?

Whose your coach -- son (4-12) of another loser SF coach (54-53-5) with the same losing @ss record as our FIRED HC!!!!!!!!!!!!! Keep riding that Nolan train - you'll realize it is a circular ride. But then Gay- Mike ... it the "ride" that you like isn't it?

QB? Alexis Smith?? Hahahahahhaha. Even Collins was better than Alexis. Alexis ... 165 attempts (throwing, not gay attempts), 84 completions (com, not cumpletions), for a pitiful 875 yards, and god-awful 50.9% completion rate, 1 TD and 11 INTS, thats 1 TD and 11 INTS, for a d@mn laughable 40.8 QB rating.

Our worst QB was the drug infused todd marijanvich ... know what his stats were ...
205 attempts, 104 completions, 50.7%, 1345 yards, 8 TDs, 9 INTs.
And he is better than Alexis.

Oh yeah

PS GAY-MIKE QUIT SENDING ME PICTURES OF YOURSELF, I DONT GO THAT WAY, SO KEEP YOUR WEIRD SPANKING PICTURES TO YOURSELF

[Pats Dynasty]

Originally Posted by RaiderOfTheSith

PS GAY-MIKE QUIT SENDING ME PICTURES OF YOURSELF, I DONT GO THAT WAY, SO KEEP YOUR WEIRD SPANKING PICTURES TO YOURSELF

Why, on God's green earth, do you even have such a picture?

[RandytheRaider]

sith, nobody wants to see that..

[RaiderBeast]

Tooo many are ganging up on Mikey.. He'll run to his other forums and take a break from here until it cools down.. Now we all know he has NO life, and that he never answers a post, but turns it into his rant.. He already copied everything and is trying to work on a comeback without bringing up the question.. So get ready for the MikeyBitch my Whiners ruled the 80's BS.. And his favorite comeback "You guys have no coach, no QB, no OL, no defense.. He forgets the Whiners have NO team period, they tried losing to Houston in the Bush Bowl but now they lost that #1 pick which the Raiders have NEVER had..

How's that 2005 #1 pick working for ya??

[GTSCH]

Originally Posted by Heat0711

i mean honestly go talk on the niners forum, coming on here and talking trash is pathetic. all that shows is that there is some jealousy....i could see why too if my team was the niners....

What do Niner fans have to be jealous of?

The Raiders had more talent on offense by far, better QB, any of your top three receivers are better than our best. Your RB is better, o-line is better, and your TE's have more than 10 catches combined.

Your defense is about on par with ours talent wise, but stats wise is better.

You played no harder a schedule than us according to strength of schedule, and somehow you managed the exact same win total.

What exactly is to be jealous of there?

Why would we be jealous of your Lombardis? We have five, and all but one of them were in my lifetime.

I notice whenever someone talks trash about any given fan's team(Raiders, Niners, Rams, etc), and they are incapable of disputing the points put in front of them, they resort to the "you're just jealous" bull****.

Amusing.

[RaiderOfTheSith]

40-whiners intelligent decisions continue ....

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercu...s/13615551.htm

Former Raiders coach Norv Turner is among possible candidates for the 49ers' vacant offensive coordinator job, Coach Mike Nolan said Thursday.

A 4-12 coach, hiring a former 4-12 coach to run the 9er's O. Jees, i cant wait for next year. Who is SF going to get #1 in the 2007 draft.