little inside info on the Pats game - Page 5 - Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board

**Raider_Len** · #61 (**permalink**) 09-05-2005, 02:30 PM

Last I heard, the hand was part of the body.
Tuckrule in this case = Bull****.
Political horsecrap, the world saw.
Case closed, except for idiots.

**RaiderRoddy** · #62 (**permalink**) 09-06-2005, 03:30 AM

Bring on Thursday Night

sonsofkraftybob · #63 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MossNPorter

doing the 46 would confuse the pats

The 4-6 would confuse your own team....considering they couldn't even comprehend the 3-4!!!!! I can see it now.....after trying the 4-6 and getting humiliated for the nationally televised season opener and setting the tone for another dissapointing season......the Raiders defense joins Barrett Robbins in a padded room.

Nothing any team...esp. the raiders can do would ever even remotely confuse the best coach ever.

sonsofkraftybob · #64 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raider_Len

Last I heard, the hand was part of the body.
Tuckrule in this case = Bull****.
Political horsecrap, the world saw.
Case closed, except for idiots.

Not for nothing, you guys are still talking about the tuck rule???? Meanwhile, the Pats are fattening up their trophy chest and blinging out their fingers...get with it homey....

flanker76 · #65 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonsofkraftybob

Not for nothing, you guys are still talking about the tuck rule???? Meanwhile, the Pats are fattening up their trophy chest and blinging out their fingers...get with it homey....

You should try to fatten up those CB's! Your little boys (5-10 max) will be no match to what we're bringing! Its going to be a long night you guys!!!!

sonsofkraftybob · #66 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flanker76

You should try to fatten up those CB's! Your little boys (5-10 max) will be no match to what we're bringing! Its going to be a long night you guys!!!!

Those CB's have the HEAVY HITTERS behind them and they contained far more superior receivers than anything the Raiders got bro.

Harrison/Wayne

Burress/Ward

T.O./Fred ex/Pinkston

I wouldn't worry....if your gameplan is pass pass pass....then you already chalked up an "L"

**RaiderRoddy** · #67 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 03:50 AM

[quote=sonsofkraftybob]... they contained far more superior receivers than anything the Raiders got bro.

Harrison/Wayne

Burress/Ward

T.O./Fred ex/Pinkston ...QUOTE]

You have just proven how moronic you are, you think these guys are as good and as deep a recieving group as MOSS/PORTER/CURRY/GABRIEL, etc. I was gonna congrtulate you on last year and wish your boys luck (after Thurs of course) for this season. But man, your statement is just plain idiotic.

See ya Thursday night

sonsofkraftybob · #68 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 04:06 AM

[quote=RaiderRoddy]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonsofkraftybob

... they contained far more superior receivers than anything the Raiders got bro.

Harrison/Wayne

Burress/Ward

T.O./Fred ex/Pinkston ...QUOTE]

You have just proven how moronic you are, you think these guys are as good and as deep a recieving group as MOSS/PORTER/CURRY/GABRIEL, etc. I was gonna congrtulate you on last year and wish your boys luck (after Thurs of course) for this season. But man, your statement is just plain idiotic.

See ya Thursday night

So the team that won 9 games in 2 season has a better recieving corp that those 3 playoff teams? Really?

**RaiderRoddy** · #69 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 04:21 AM

[quote=sonsofkraftybob]

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaiderRoddy

So the team that won 9 games in 2 season has a better recieving corp that those 3 playoff teams? Really?

First of all, this is a new season, you can tell by all the preseason stuff that has been going on lately.
OK I will humor you for a bit. The WRs in Indy are as godd as they get anywhere in the league, but of course after Stokley who is there. We go deeper is all I meant. Ward is a good WR, granted, but Plax just doesn't cut it, and again to think Randel El as good as Curry or Gabriel, or Morant is just plain foolish. Remember we are talking depth here too. And finallly, TO is argueably the best in the game at his position. However, Pinkston and a guy that got cut from the Chiefs (Freddie Mitchell) can certainly not be even mentioned in the same paragraph as our guys. Actually I would rather have your recievers then them.

See you Thursday night, and we can settle this next week.

**RaiderRoddy** · #70 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 04:41 AM

Why is this in SMACK ?????

**billwilliams70** · #71 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrex

Well like I have said before my dad sometimes works with Kirk Morrisons dad.
Kirk Morrison says that they have a little special somthin somthin for the Pats that will surprise alot of people.
Just thought you guys might enjoy that. i know i did!

Thanks, makes me even more psyched about the game.

Later.

sonsofkraftybob · #72 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 05:04 AM

[quote=RaiderRoddy]

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonsofkraftybob

First of all, this is a new season, you can tell by all the preseason stuff that has been going on lately.
OK I will humor you for a bit. The WRs in Indy are as godd as they get anywhere in the league, but of course after Stokley who is there. We go deeper is all I meant. Ward is a good WR, granted, but Plax just doesn't cut it, and again to think Randel El as good as Curry or Gabriel, or Morant is just plain foolish. Remember we are talking depth here too. And finallly, TO is argueably the best in the game at his position. However, Pinkston and a guy that got cut from the Chiefs (Freddie Mitchell) can certainly not be even mentioned in the same paragraph as our guys. Actually I would rather have your recievers then them.

See you Thursday night, and we can settle this next week.

I like the argument. I was just causing a ruckus....Colts wideouts are the best. I actually hate Pittsburgh and the Eagles have T.O. and no one......but, I still think your recievers a just a little better than middle of the road now that you have Moss...B- I guess.

Either way I appreciated the civil response......which BTW my opening smack talk thread got deleted...I assume is the only responses allowed.

Here's to a good game that puts the whole league on notice!!!!

Humblebolt · #73 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrex

Well like I have said before my dad sometimes works with Kirk Morrisons dad.

Kirk Morrison says that they have a little special somthin somthin for the Pats that will surprise alot of people.

Just thought you guys might enjoy that. i know i did!

I'm sure Bill Belichick will have something special for the Raiders as well.

OG BAMM BAMM · #74 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 11:29 AM

[quote=sonsofkraftybob]

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaiderRoddy

I like the argument. I was just causing a ruckus....Colts wideouts are the best. I actually hate Pittsburgh and the Eagles have T.O. and no one......but, I still think your recievers a just a little better than middle of the road now that you have Moss...B- I guess.

Either way I appreciated the civil response......which BTW my opening smack talk thread got deleted...I assume is the only responses allowed.

Here's to a good game that puts the whole league on notice!!!!

welcome to the site...good luck

**RaiderRoddy** · #75 (**permalink**) 09-07-2005, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonsofkraftybob

...
Here's to a good game that puts the whole league on notice!!!!

I will drink to that

See ya Thursday at the stadium, I'll be in Silver & Black.