Well wuddo you know, even Non- Raider fans agree with me.

[DavetheRaider]

The people on the message board (link on bottom of post) have the same opinion that me and AceRimRat have. That is that the Raiders are better comparing individually, but the play as a team and their D-Line makes everyone else better.
WOW! Raider fans are more pessimistic about our D than other team's fans!

http://s3.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/ge...&topic=8034582

[LongFavor]

respond to posts by, well, not respoding.
Me, I'll call you a ****SUCKER cause I'm just a ****er like that.
****SUCKER.

[bigtoe_o]

Did you even read the replies to that post. Who agreed w/ you?? The replies I read all DISagreed w/ you. please stop making Raider fans sound dumb on every board you can find until some other idiot finally agrees w/ you. It is just sad!

[GoDeep]

Al Davis does not subcribe to that theory. Al goes his own way. The day he gets a real DC is the day the Raider will have a D. WE have the players to be as GOOD as TB WAS. The Ravens were a GREAT team on D, not a good one. They didn't do a repeat cause they got to full of themselfs. And then of course they had cap issues. I can't see Al having one dominate unit, and relying on that one unit taking us to Houston. Like TB & the Ravens did in their SB seasons. Dave the Raider, in case you have not noticed i'm doing everything i can to legitimize your orginial post. I'll let you know where to send the money.

[silvernblack10]

davetheraider, please get the **** off this board, that **** is over with, get on with your life fag

[AceRimRat]

Originally posted by DavetheRaider
The people on the message board (link on bottom of post) have the same opinion that me and AceRimRat have. That is that the Raiders are better comparing individually, but the play as a team and their D-Line makes everyone else better.
WOW! Raider fans are more pessimistic about our D than other team's fans!

http://s3.cgi.gamefaqs.com/boards/ge...&topic=8034582

Looked like a lot of people disagreed with you over there, too.

And I mean, I disagree with your initial assessment, too (though you've backtracked some). I agree the Raiders have several players that match up favorably with their Tampa counterparts, but I thought my post was clear on the reason I think your initial thesis (the Raider D is better than the Buc D) is wrong: Proportion of betterness, for lack of a better way of saying it, and intangibles. You'll recall my bottom line is that the Bucs have the better defense, and by a reasonable margin.

I only point this out since you mentioned me by name and I don't believe you're quite representing my views accurately. No flame intended.

[83Raiders]

Dave the ****ing Qweef Fan, over here trying to stir up ****. Doesn't work, I'm a Qweef sniffer, sniff, sniff, and I smell a Qweef Fan.