Let the haters hate, then show them this.

[BlackDawg]

Originally Posted by Devilspawn

Few owners have had more success than Davis statistically. In fact, only Rooney and DeBarttolo come to mind.

Some have had just as much success (Kraft, Jones) and I can throw in Wellington Mara because he is still responsible for the team that won this year. And only Mara's success is spread over a longer period that predates Davis' reign by a few years.

The last five years taint what is still a legendary career. But Al is in a company of a select few, and he even leads a few of that few. That is all.

few owners have guided their franchises to 5 straight double digit loss seasons either, the Bidwells and the owner of the Bungles comes to mind. No owner has ever guided their franchise to 6, another Al historical milestone, make sure there's enough space on the bio for it.

[Devilspawn]

Originally Posted by BlackDawg

few owners have guided their franchises to 5 straight double digit loss seasons either, the Bidwells and the owner of the Bungles comes to mind. No owner has ever guided their franchise to 6, another Al historical milestone, make sure there's enough space on the bio for it.

You try too hard Dawg, and you fall twice as hard. Tell you what though, to throw you a bone, that part of the bio that you'll beat off to can go at the middle of the book, right before the glorious intro and the glorious recap. We'll mail it to you, highlight the chapter, dedicate it just for you and even through in a laugh track when the pages open, just to satisfy your fetish.

Sht, if Davis was compared to Spanos and whoever came before him, combined, it would be a slaughter from cover to cover. You guys MIGHT get your own chapter, but it would be smaller than a Dr. Seuss rhyme, written in that form so that your reading level can grasp what it means to suck for 45 years vs 5.

[BlackDawg]

Originally Posted by Devilspawn

You try too hard Dawg, and you fall twice as hard. Tell you what though, to throw you a bone, that part of the bio that you'll beat off to can go at the middle of the book, right before the glorious intro and the glorious recap. We'll mail it to you, highlight the chapter, dedicate it just for you and even through in a laugh track when the pages open, just to satisfy your fetish.

Sht, if Davis was compared to Spanos and whoever came before him, combined, it would be a slaughter from cover to cover. You guys MIGHT get your own chapter, but it would be smaller than a Dr. Seuss rhyme, written in that form so that your reading level can grasp what it means to suck for 45 years vs 5.

Tha sad part is the try as you might the Spanoses have NEVER, lemme repeat that HAVE NEVER had a 5 year run of 5 consecutive losing seasons, yeah Old man Spanos is a lame-o owner, but he's never sunk to Al's depth of losing. Might wanna put an ice pack on that lump.

San Diego Chargers Team Encyclopedia - Pro-Football-Reference.com

6 and counting.....

[BeforeDishonor]

Shut up. San Diego is boring and for townies and the Chargers wear space suits. Giving statistical **** when you're talking **** just makes you a nerd.

[Devilspawn]

Originally Posted by BlackDawg

Tha sad part is the try as you might the Spanoses have NEVER, lemme repeat that HAVE NEVER had a 5 year run of 5 consecutive losing seasons, yeah Old man Spanos is a lame-o owner, but he's never sunk to Al's depth of losing. Might wanna put an ice pack on that lump.

San Diego Chargers Team Encyclopedia - Pro-Football-Reference.com

6 and counting.....

Swinging wildly now, are we?

We were IN the Superbowl 6 years ago, 5 if you're going by years of the calendar and not the NFL. Still waiting for the Chargers' 2nd so that most of your bandwagon fanbase can say something other than that they were in finger painting in pre-school the last time the Chargers were playing in the superbowl.

And that link, really. Compare that to the Raiders link and you lose. Losing record as a franchise in 48 years of existence. Losing playoff record that is nearly 1/3 of our playoff victories. See where I'm getting at, loser? No, you think that 4 years of being also rans counts as being winners. We only did it for a brief three year period and had a greater run. Oh wait, are you about to spit out 48-21 on us?

Damn, the only time San Diego sees a West superbowl is when Denver and Oakland are playing it in. Pathetic. Got any more links to compare?

I would throw out more comparisons on this thread but it's been said over and over. You can post all you want about the last five years with the Bengals... oh, that Bengals team that have seen more Superbowl appearances... or five consecutive last place seasons or double digit losing seasons. It would mean something if San Diego did more than just a mere Championship Game appearance (not win) and winning seasons that only bring you closer to a .500 record as a franchise, something they haven't seen our first superbowl championship. First.

48 year and counting.....