Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Raiders Sign Cam Sims WR

  1. #1

  2. #2
    not understanding why we are signing all these wrs ???

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by mstrbass2000 View Post
    not understanding why we are signing all these wrs ???
    Not sure, mstrbass2000. Im kind of wondering if Renfrow or maybe even Adams are being moved. We have a shitload of receivers now. Half wont even make the team.

  4. #4
    wouldn't it be better to just trade for dhop, trade renfrow off and cut some of these castoff signing ??? imagine dadams,meyers in teh slot and dhop on the other side for jimmy g and josh running it wowsa

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by raiderman41 View Post
    Not sure, mstrbass2000. Im kind of wondering if Renfrow or maybe even Adams are being moved. We have a shitload of receivers now. Half wont even make the team.
    Adams and Renfrow were the only receivers on the roster. It was an actual low key need. Meyers will end up working outside and in the slot. Sims is a big bodied, RZ target. Dorsett may make the team. The rest are camp fodder.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by mstrbass2000 View Post
    not understanding why we are signing all these wrs ???
    McDaniels just like Gruden would much rather work with veteran receivers, than having the number 5-6 receivers be rookies. Is this considered a weak draft for WRs?

    Adams, Meyers, Renfrow, Dorsett, Sims, Cole

    Guessing much of the draft will be spent on CBs, OL, DL, an LB.

  7. #7
    I believe Simms is a special teams contributor taking Mack Hollins place.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Poconos, PA
    Posts
    8,505
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiderjohn622 View Post
    McDaniels just like Gruden would much rather work with veteran receivers, than having the number 5-6 receivers be rookies. Is this considered a weak draft for WRs?

    Adams, Meyers, Renfrow, Dorsett, Sims, Cole

    Guessing much of the draft will be spent on CBs, OL, DL, an LB.
    The Raiders have a too many needs to fill by the draft alone. It's also hard to find first year starters in the later rounds.
    I hope they still bring in some proven starters in free agency and not go dumpster diving for players later on.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnkr View Post
    The Raiders have a too many needs to fill by the draft alone. It's also hard to find first year starters in the later rounds.
    I hope they still bring in some proven starters in free agency and not go dumpster diving for players later on.
    I don't think they view this is a 1 year thing where they bring guys in and expect to win the Superbowl this year. I think they view this as trying to build the team up through multiple drafts and then supplement depth with FA.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiderjohn622 View Post
    McDaniels just like Gruden would much rather work with veteran receivers, than having the number 5-6 receivers be rookies. Is this considered a weak draft for WRs?

    Adams, Meyers, Renfrow, Dorsett, Sims, Cole

    Guessing much of the draft will be spent on CBs, OL, DL, an LB.
    actually its a very deep class at wr, you can get a good one all the way tot he 4th rd

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •