Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: The Raiders should designate Jacobs with the Non-Exclusive Franchise Tag

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Poconos, PA
    Posts
    8,505

    The Raiders should designate Jacobs with the Non-Exclusive Franchise Tag

    The non-exclusive franchise tag would be cheaper compared to the exclusive tag.
    Jacobs' agent would be able to negotiate a deal with another team.
    The Raiders would be able to match the deal and keep Jacobs.
    If the Raiders decline the deal, the other team has to give the Raiders two first round picks.

  2. #2
    I like it. Price down, and if he takes the additional money, more picks,

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Poconos, PA
    Posts
    8,505
    The NFL just released franchise tag numbers for 2023. The non-exclusive tag for Jacobs would cost the Raiders $10,091,000.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnkr View Post
    The NFL just released franchise tag numbers for 2023. The non-exclusive tag for Jacobs would cost the Raiders $10,091,000.
    no way do i wanna pay exclusive tag on an rb, that would be idiotic when rbs are a disposable position

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Poconos, PA
    Posts
    8,505
    Quote Originally Posted by mstrbass2000 View Post
    no way do i wanna pay exclusive tag on an rb, that would be idiotic when rbs are a disposable position
    $10M is very reasonable for the rushing champ. The non-exclusive tag gets the Raiders two first round draft picks from any team that signs him. The Raiders would be crazy to let him walk.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnkr View Post
    $10M is very reasonable for the rushing champ. The non-exclusive tag gets the Raiders two first round draft picks from any team that signs him. The Raiders would be crazy to let him walk.
    im fine with non exclusive, what im against is exclusive tag and i agree 10 million is very reasonable and wont kill us on cap

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Poconos, PA
    Posts
    8,505
    I'd be happy to keep Jacobs, but two first round picks would be nice too.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by johnkr View Post
    i'd be happy to keep jacobs, but two first round picks would be nice too.
    yep, we could grab bijan, dudes gonna be a stud

  9. #9
    He should be making more than Henry's current contract and less than Zeke and CMC. So that would be around $13m-14m last I checked. I would be ok with that. It all depends how he feels about the money. He's not going to like the non-exclusive tag.

  10. #10
    Sign him. He is a big part of the offense and teams have to plan their defense accordingly to stop him. He's a game changer. You don't let players like that walk away or tag them, making them feel disrespected and uninspired.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •