Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 64

Thread: Ndamukong Suh

  1. #1

    Ndamukong Suh

    We should be kicking the tires to see what this guy wants. Imagine Suh with Hurst. If we get Sweat in the draft imagine that line for a second. Suh, Hurst at DL. Key, Sweat at the edges.

    Should the Raiders be looking at Suh? I'd say yes.

  2. #2
    It a bit strange no-one
    has signed him...is he asking
    too much money?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by PhillyRaider View Post
    We should be kicking the tires to see what this guy wants. Imagine Suh with Hurst. If we get Sweat in the draft imagine that line for a second. Suh, Hurst at DL. Key, Sweat at the edges.

    Should the Raiders be looking at Suh? I'd say yes.
    id rather draft Q OVER SIGNING SUH WHOM IS COMING OFF OF A DOWN YR AND GETTING OLDER

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperRaider View Post
    It a bit strange no-one
    has signed him...is he asking
    too much money?
    im sure suh wants at least 14 million a yr,nonody iss gonna give him that when they can draft a young dt instead and have control for 5 yrs under a cheap contract

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by mstrbass2000 View Post
    id rather draft Q OVER SIGNING SUH WHOM IS COMING OFF OF A DOWN YR AND GETTING OLDER
    Drafting Q would still leave us with a gaping hole at edge with only Key. The chances that Q would or could have the same impact as Suh is less than 50/50. Look what Suh did for Aaron Donald last year. Think Q has the same impact? Not likely at all.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by mstrbass2000 View Post
    im sure suh wants at least 14 million a yr,nonody iss gonna give him that when they can draft a young dt instead and have control for 5 yrs under a cheap contract
    That's their choice but then they won't be getting the same quality of player either. So hold on to your scrub dt for 5 years while Suh dominates for someone other than you.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by PhillyRaider View Post
    Drafting Q would still leave us with a gaping hole at edge with only Key. The chances that Q would or could have the same impact as Suh is less than 50/50. Look what Suh did for Aaron Donald last year. Think Q has the same impact? Not likely at all.
    Q'S upside is much higher then suh's currently and he would be much cheaper and younger plus we can still get a good d/e at #24 or #27 as for suh impacting donald's play i doubt it,donald been the best for multiple yrs already

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by PhillyRaider View Post
    That's their choice but then they won't be getting the same quality of player either. So hold on to your scrub dt for 5 years while Suh dominates for someone other than you.
    suh didn't dominate while playing next to brockers and donald,had one of his worst yrs of his career,id rather go with the rookie whoms upside is much higher and his cost's is much cheaper

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by mstrbass2000 View Post
    suh didn't dominate while playing next to brockers and donald,had one of his worst yrs of his career,id rather go with the rookie whoms upside is much higher and his cost's is much cheaper
    You are correct. Philyidiot thinks a yellow jacket is already made for Sweat. It's like arguing with wall

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by mstrbass2000 View Post
    suh didn't dominate while playing next to brockers and donald,had one of his worst yrs of his career,id rather go with the rookie whoms upside is much higher and his cost's is much cheaper
    Then you didn't pay attention. Suh opened everything up for Donald last year to the point where Donald was able to post career numbers. He drew constant double teams which left Donald 1v1.

    Donald went from averaging less than 10 sacks a year without Suh to all of a sudden getting 20.5 LOL. That was because he had the best DT in the game playing next to him.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •