Jerry Porter for Mr. Owens?

[RaiderInNY]

Originally Posted by WNYRAIDER

I say we give Dallas our 3rd rounder to GIVE TO to Denver.

LOL...

[kennyrat923]

Hell nah!!

[RC]

Hell No!!!!!!!!

[AirRaiders]

I don't know about all of you but I'd take TO for Jerry Porter anyday of the week. Look at the 2 and they are very similar the only difference is the play on the football field which TO is far better then Jerry Porter.

TO is hurt and missing practice as Jerry Porter is pretending to be also. TO at least isn't wearing a shirt and saying to anybody that will listen that he doesn't want to be part of the team.

So he missed a meeting which happens to many football players in the league which is never reported the difference is since it is TO every little thing is blown up to be a big deal just like Moss and Brooks was after 2 preseason games together.

But when TO gets out on the playing field look out he is a stud. Another thing to take into consideration is the Cowboys are in a far better situation with TO because there is a clause in his contract that they can release him with not much cap hit whereas Porter is a huge hit for us.

[Rhin0]

Porter isn't going anywhere.

[Akumen]

Originally Posted by raterfann

................The whole trade JP thing is getting old
Im sure Al would trade one problem for another one, If that did happen who would be Oaklands #1 WR Moss or TO

Why bother

If that did happen, which it wont, parcells aint that dumb... T.O. would be the #1 reciver, moss would be #2, and they'd both play in the slot alternating when in a 3wr formation... its not a knock on moss just being rational... skill sets alone with out the other stuff owens would be brooks main target, moss would run streaks, deep posts. and screens... TO would run slants come back routes ect. then they would switch roles to keep the d honest... it could be the greatest passing attack ever known in football.. and would go along way to bringing back a raider slogan saying we take what we want... but we all know it would be a potentially explosive situation... so alot of us would rather back from the idea... and some of us are drama queens that have fell face first into a media bonanza, at the same time cursing them for the way they misrepresent us to the nation.....

i think art could handle any situation... when it comes to personalities that is
hes handling porter perfectly.. cause really, these players want to play... if you aint entertaining the crowd... anything you say means nothing.. this issue with JP is going pretty smoove, and shell can handle any wrdiva in the same manner.... back on subject...parcells wont have a problem with TO he wont let it get that far... he'll just move on before he lets it become a problem

[raiderfan1208]

NO what are u thinking?

[LINQ0311]

One problem for an even bigger problem with a bigger paycheck. No thanks.

[RAIDER925]

Dallas wouldn't do that...... But Moss & Owens

[MR.ANLP]

Dallas Can Keep Their Issue And We'll Keep Ours,--i Say Hell Nah!!!!

[Attyla]

if there is any doubt that to is a bad guy, the fact that Tuna calls him "the player" and not by his name is proof enough for me.

"the player" needs to "play" elsewhere and not in Oakland where we have cleaned out most of our locker room "players"

As for this thread, it is "played" out and needs to go away. I had enough of "get the player" threads in Feb and March.

[Dylan Baboth]

Moss and Owens on the same team working together to do whats best for the team......... ....that would never happen.

[Gotta Love Al]

That would be a HUGE mistake.

[OTF]

I would rather see T.O. in Denver so he could tear their team apart, not ours!

[Swoosh23]

Moss will never play on a team with owens (except maybe a pro bowl team one day) and has expressed that clearly.