Mike McMahon? - Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board

Josh Wheeler · #1 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 04:56 AM

We could sign him cheap and he'd be a decent backup for Walter!
http://www.kffl.com/player/661/nfl

cat4 · #2 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:05 AM

not sur , prefer brooks

DaveK913 · #3 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:05 AM

Ed McMahon would be a better back up for Walter.

oakdawg24 · #4 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cat4

not sur , prefer brooks

What he said!

Josh Wheeler · #5 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:11 AM

Sure Brooks is a better QB, but he's gonna cost us alot more $!

**AutumnWind32** · #6 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:16 AM

Tui fits the needs that McMahon would bring. The only difference is McMahon has had his chance and failed, whereas Tui hasn't ever gotten a legitimate shot. If we would consider signing McMahon, why not keep Tui instead??

**Rayderfan77** · #7 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutumnWind32

Tui fits the needs that McMahon would bring. The only difference is McMahon has had his chance and failed, whereas Tui hasn't ever gotten a legitimate shot. If we would consider signing McMahon, why not keep Tui instead??

At first, I liked the idea of bringing in McMahon because he would be cheap and would be at least an adequate back up, but you make an awesome point....we already have a Mike McMahon type QB on the roster who is extremely cheap why not use him. So, I agree with you. Great point.

Josh Wheeler · #8 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:21 AM

I'm saying: #1 - Walter
#2 - Tui
#3 - McMahon
We do need 1 more QB to secure the roster and he's cheaper than Harrington, Brooks, Collins,etc.

speedkills · #9 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 05:31 AM

mcmahon blows i dont even want him as a third stringer i rather have brooks or maddox or someone with a bit of experience and has had a bit of success mcmahon is a career 44% passer!

NationVader · #10 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 06:07 AM

Our starting QB is waiting to be drafted.

**AutumnWind32** · #11 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh Wheeler

I'm saying: #1 - Walter
#2 - Tui
#3 - McMahon
We do need 1 more QB to secure the roster and he's cheaper than Harrington, Brooks, Collins,etc.

He's not veteran enough. We need a 8+ year QB to go along with our youngsters. He doesn't have anything to offer that we need.

**AutumnWind32** · #12 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NationVader

Our starting QB is waiting to be drafted.

So you're on the Vince Young bandwagon huh? Interesting.

psly2124 · #13 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 07:23 AM

I thought McMahon was going to be an O.K. QB until he played last year. Why would anyone want a player as a backup that has no chance of winning a game for you. McMahon is not a good QB and he should not be an option. He has already proved that he cannot backup with a good team.

ohraider21 · #14 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 09:12 AM

I always like Mike Mcmahon. He is a very athletic Qb that should have been starting in front of harrington when he was in detroit.

psly2124 · #15 (**permalink**) 03-21-2006, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ohraider21

I always like Mike Mcmahon. He is a very athletic Qb that should have been starting in front of harrington when he was in detroit.

Let's get realistic...Harrington is far from a good Qb. If you saw McMahon play last year you wouldn't be saying that.