|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||||
|
You and your ilk are the one's making excuses for our front seven by blaming the FS for our poor run D. Why not blame it on the kicker why you're at it?
|
|
||||||||||||
|
I think Stu gets treated a lot worse that he deserves. The bad Run D wasn't his fault, we allowed too many runs to make it into the secondary. He missed a couple tackles, but then, so did the rest of our D. He was competent at his position, not spectacular, but that makes him a solid backup. I wouldn't mind if he stayed in that capacity. If he does get shipped out, I wish him the best at whatever team he signs with.
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The Schweigert era is OVER! Finally we won't have to put up with his missed tackles, breakdowns in coverage, and standing around holding his wang while the other team scored.
Here's to you, Stu, you ****ing ****sucker
__________________
Embarrassed to be a fan |
|
|||||||||||
|
I tend to agree with those that believe the front 7 are the main reason for our poor run defense. Blaming Stu, despite the missed "missed ankle tackles" for our piss-poor run D never made too much sense.
And the scary part is the Raiders have done nothing to address the problem. OK, I'll get with the program - suddenly Kelly and Sands are going to live up to expectations and all our run defense problems will disappear. Hmmmm, yeaaaah. Righhhhhht. I hope Stu stays on board. He's an excellent special teams player and would provide very good depth at the safety position. |