|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||||||||||
|
Oakland Raiders Moving to L.A. in 2011? Or Vikings, Chargers, Bills or Jaguars? - FanHouse - AOL Sports Blog
Man, I hope not... Oh well, whatever's best for the franchise... Or not? Whats everybodys opinion? |
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
|
||||||||||||
|
I hope not, but we'll see. There is a game in Toronto this year, and there has been talk of an expansion team there. You would think more teams means more revenue, but i don't know all the ins and outs of the expansion issue. Of course in Toronto you compete with the Arganouts, right?
__________________
G da Mac's xmas wish list: John Madden & Tim Brown in the front office; A quality HC; A Franchise LT ![]() |
|
||||||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() Quit trying to Whore the Raiders
__________________
Just get some wins Raiders.....please |
|
||||||||||||
|
New Black Hole?
Here's the video previewing the possible stadium sight. It looks really nice. I wish Oakland would/could compete with this either way- leaving or not.
Images & Video on Los Angeles Stadium |
|
||||||||||||
|
they will go, Raiders need a new stadium and Raiders aren't really doing much in oakland right now, we don't even sell out anymore unless its primetime game, but the signs point to that.
Al davis is crazy so don't think he won't do it .....
__________________
![]()
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Add to that that the CBA isn't working out as projected because small market teams are being bailed out constantly by large market teams which could potentially get worse if more teams are added to the mix. Although, a team in LA shouldn't be a detriment to revenue sharing.
__________________
![]() "You Have No Idea Of The Power Of The Darkside" |
|
||||||||||||
|
yep. Al thinks he has the rights to LA anyway. If a new stadium is built I think Al will be all over it. If hed got a new stadium before he wouldent have went back to Oakland in the first place.
|
|
#30 ( |