Jets contact Raiders to trade up to get McFadden ?

[FLORIDARAYDAH]

I think a trade with the jets is better than with Dallas.I dont like the coleman part of it but moving back 2 spots we can still grab Gholston/Ellis and pick up an extra pick

[OLLiE]

Granted DM is no Eli Manning but for the Giants to move up 4 spots w/ the chargers it took...

two 1st round picks
one 3rd round pick
one 5th round pick

For the Browns to get back in the 1st round last year so they could get B. Quinn it took
2nd rounder that year
and a 1st rounder this year

Considering DM is supposed to be THAT can't miss franchise RB there better be some better compensation then Coleman.

[O-townupnorth]

Originally Posted by OLLiE

Granted DM is no Eli Manning but for the Giants to move up 4 spots w/ the chargers it took...

two 1st round picks
one 3rd round pick
one 5th round pick

For the Browns to get back in the 1st round last year so they could get B. Quinn it took
2nd rounder that year
and a 1st rounder this year

Considering DM is supposed to be THAT can't miss franchise RB there better be some better compensation then Coleman.

Jets 2nd would be nice imo.

[raiderfos34]

i dont mind trading down but they need to throw in another pick before i would even think about it! We go down 2 6 we can still fill a need on our team with a dt like ellis

[MT/Cali Raider]

screw kenyon coleman, but lets take the Jets for all they've got to give. personally don't think DMAC is gonna be worth the top 10 contract. Sure he'll be good but not as good as billed and we need the picks.

[raider_fan18]

this rumor means nothing to me. i think we could trade spots with the jets but it would take a hell of alot more then a bum that we got rid of. it makes me lol

[or24]

Id rather trade with dallas unless they would give up their 2nd and maybe 3rd lol

[Ryno4444]

Originally Posted by cad

im all for it if Chris Long is off the board as well as Jake Long and we land an extra 2nd and 3rd possibly

Then We'd be in the range for a Clady, Ellis or outside chance of Gholston

i would personally want to land Dorsey if the Longs were taken

I'm with you. We need the extra picks.

[silverNblackAZ]

raiders just signed edwards from detroit. not a stud or anything close, but seems to compare to coleman. i doubt davis would take this trade. after all he did manage to get a 1st for jolley from the jets, i doubt he gives up the number 4 pick so cheaply.

[ginnyann]

How many picks does Al have in the first three rounds? I think only one now and that is the number 4 pick. I don't see a DE, DT, or WR with the pick anymore considering free agency. I believe McFadden will be the pick because he is the best player on the board at that point. I think his speed has sold Al.

[MT/Cali Raider]

bull****e. Coleman has zero value, so lets see how reliable this could be??? i'd take #6 their second this year and their first next, or second and third next.

[yayarea_raider]

Originally Posted by TKO8

I would be fine with this trade, he is not so much a pass rusher, but good against the run. DE is our biggest need right now IMO and if we do this trade.....

The Jets can take DMC at 4 and we can take Gholston at 6 and then that gives us Burgess,Richardson, Coleman, and Gholston. We would go from weak spot at DE to very solid with the additions of Gholston and Coleman.

The Fins could shock us all and take Gholston first.

1.) Fins-Gholston
2.) Rams-Glenn Dorsey (I don't see Rams taking Chris, Dorsey would make a better impact to that D Line, and Carrikker could move back to his original DE spot)
3.) Falcons-Sed Ellis
4.) Raiders-? Chris Long

with the 3 top D Lineman gone, and RB not a huge need, we would trade the pick or select who? Not Jake Long he look like a RT and scouts have said he is not quick enough. I have seem some film on him, and he is a good running and pass blocker. I think Albert or Clady would be a better selection, but not at #4. I hope Jones is interested, or the jets, otherwise I th might be a good idea and pick McFadden. Then put him on the trade block and ask for their 1st, 2nd, and a player. Or 2 1st's...it all depends on who trades with us.

Since we have Edwards now, I'm not so sure DE should be a 1st round pick. Hopefully Akbar can get good reps in when Burgess needs breater. Edwards/Richardson IMO should be at least an ok line up opposite of Burgess.

[raiderdude06]

Throw in a second rounder, maybe a third rounder, then I would do it.

[Thedeparted]

Originally Posted by TKO8

I would be fine with this trade, he is not so much a pass rusher, but good against the run. DE is our biggest need right now IMO and if we do this trade.....

The Jets can take DMC at 4 and we can take Gholston at 6 and then that gives us Burgess,Richardson, Coleman, and Gholston. We would go from weak spot at DE to very solid with the additions of Gholston and Coleman.

I agree 98% lol

If we do this thing, we need to get at least something more in return.