Larry Fitzgerald - Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board

OrlandoRaiders · #1 (**permalink**) 09-27-2007, 11:57 PM

If there is an inkling of truth to this I want the Raiders to be first in line to grab this guy. I have a sneaking suspicion that Porter gets cut next year. Huge playmaker for Russell. Lets right a wrong.

Quote:

FITZGERALD EYEBALLING ARIZONA EXIT?

Only two regular-season games into the Ken Whisenhunt era, rumors already are flying receiver Larry Fitzgerald is looking to leave the Cardinals when his rookie contract ends.

Fitzgerald, as the rumor goes, is not a big fan of Whisenhunt's run-based offense, and for good reason. Fitzgerald currently is averaging only five catches and 53.5 yards per game, which puts him on pace for 80 receptions and 856 receiving yards for the season. He currently has no receiving touchdowns in 2007.

There's no indication that Fitzgerald, the No. 3 overall pick in the 2004 draft, plans to try to force his way out prematurely. Based on the escalators in his rookie contract, there was speculation when it was signed that the Cardinals would likely have to extend the deal after four seasons. Since this is Fitzgerald's fourth season, and given that it's hard to justify two highly-paid wideouts (Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin) if the offense doesn't take full advantage of both of their skills, it could be time for the Cardinals to think about trading Fitzgerald.

One potential destination would be Minnesota, given that Fitzgerald is a native of Minneapolis and worked as a ball boy during the days of Cris Carter and Randy Moss. Though plenty of folks are murmuring about the Vikes possibly sniffing around Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, we think it makes more sense for the Vikes try to bring Fitzgerald home.

Especially if the team wants to sell out the Metrodome on a regular basis.

**kennyrat923** · #2 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 12:03 AM

Interesting. I wouldn't be surprised if a team like San Diego wanted him as well as the Ravens & Titans.

XXX-RAIDER · #3 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 12:52 AM

^ I'm sure there are a lot of teams that would be happy to have him.

Twiztedjb · #4 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 01:03 AM

I **cking wish! He's a total bad ass WR. Would love to have him and Curry on the same team!

**kennyrat923** · #5 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XXX-RAIDER

^ I'm sure there are a lot of teams that would be happy to have him.

That's true. He's a hell of a receiver IMHO.

psycho5150 · #6 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 01:47 AM

i wanted him since he was drafted and we had a chance to get him but if available would be a welcomed addition!

ILRaidersFan1 · #7 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 02:05 AM

I dont think that we could afford him. I think our cap is going to be outta control next year.

**nsraiderfan** · #8 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 02:14 AM

I'd rather have boldin

**Sonic Raider** · #9 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 02:42 AM

When Fitzgerald becomes available in free agency, the Raiders need to make a move on that guy. other than Ronald Curry, what other proven WRs do we have? Porter only had ONE game in which he excelled (the 2004 Raiders @ Broncos), we don't know if Johnnie Lee Higgins is gonna be a great WR, Mike Williams hasn't been pleasing as of late (dropping those easy passes against Cleveland last week).

ismail86 · #10 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 03:06 AM

I'd love it but the only problem is...if he's unhappy with the run 1st offense...why would he come to another one in Oakland?

**06Stang** · #11 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ismail86

I'd love it but the only problem is...if he's unhappy with the run 1st offense...why would he come to another one in Oakland?

Exactly what i was thinking. Spot on spot on.

OrlandoRaiders · #12 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ismail86

I'd love it but the only problem is...if he's unhappy with the run 1st offense...why would he come to another one in Oakland?

True, but you have to consider the JaMarcus Russell factor. I dont think Leinart can stretch the field enough to take advantage of the talent at reciever he has. But great point.

Raiderjersey · #13 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 08:25 AM

bottom line is we need a long ball threat and somebody needs to step up. with moss gone and us have possession recievers we need to get somebody whether its fitz or not we will make a move.

**airaider 2005** · #14 (**permalink**) 09-28-2007, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sonic Raider

When Fitzgerald becomes available in free agency, the Raiders need to make a move on that guy. other than Ronald Curry, what other proven WRs do we have? Porter only had ONE game in which he excelled (the 2004 Raiders @ Broncos), we don't know if Johnnie Lee Higgins is gonna be a great WR, Mike Williams hasn't been pleasing as of late (dropping those easy passes against Cleveland last week).

How do you figure Porter had one good game in his career?