Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The Lions have given no recent indication they're willing to trade backup QB Josh Mc

  1. #1
    Raiders40's Avatar
    Raiders40 is offline Limited Membership
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, raised in the Bay Area
    Posts
    15,151
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    The Lions have given no recent indication they're willing to trade backup QB Josh Mc

    Josh McCown-QB-Lions Apr. 19 - 7:19 pm et


    NFL Network's Adam Schefter reports the Lions have given no recent indication they're willing to trade backup QB Josh McCown.

    Schefter says the Lions may be posturing, but that it "sounds to (him)" like the team will not be moving McCown before the season. This would eliminate another candidate to start at QB for the Raiders in 2007, possibly forcing them to focus their attention on Daunte Culpepper.
    Related: Daunte Culpepper
    http://www.rotoworld.com/content/Home_NFL.aspx

  2. #2
    AutumnWind32's Avatar
    AutumnWind32 is offline Limited Membership
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Another Dimension
    Posts
    10,517
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Now there's a poorly run organization.

  3. #3
    YoungLegend's Avatar
    YoungLegend is offline Limited Membership
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    13,362
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    it explains why the raiders contacted Rattay.

  4. #4
    thatraider707's Avatar
    thatraider707 is offline Limited Membership
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,371
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    let rattay, walter and a rook battle it out at camp. Rattay has more experience and he can be a good back up/mentor to walter. CJ will make walter a better QB. not to mention Kiffin can mold an offense to fit the QB's strength. something he didn't have last year. if not at least Brohm and booty will be avaliable next year lol

  5. #5
    reggaesand's Avatar
    reggaesand is offline Limited Membership
    Starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    111
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    The Lions are just trying to do whatever they can to force the Raiders into taking a QB at #1 because it will make #2 that much more valuable with everyone wanting to trade up to get CJ.

    Screw the Lions, CJ will be going #1.
    Screw KC too if they are trying to hold up the Green to Miami trade so Culpepper can't sign with the Raiders.

    Actually screw KC anyway!

  6. #6
    yoda is offline Limited Membership
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    783
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    yeah, i'm cool with rattay, walter, and edwards and cj. i'm also cool with russell, rattay, and walter with zach miller instead of edwards. i think we're in a winning situation here no matter what. if we get russell, i think we'll bring in martinez to help him out, so i'm not too worried.

  7. #7
    Ashman23's Avatar
    Ashman23 is offline 2007 Raiderfans.net Sponsor
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Australia-Melb,Victoria
    Posts
    1,074
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by reggaesand View Post
    The Lions are just trying to do whatever they can to force the Raiders into taking a QB at #1 because it will make #2 that much more valuable with everyone wanting to trade up to get CJ.

    Screw the Lions, CJ will be going #1.
    Screw KC too if they are trying to hold up the Green to Miami trade so Culpepper can't sign with the Raiders.

    Actually screw KC anyway!

    Yeah BABY.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •