|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||||||||||
|
The last time the Cheifs let a QB go, it was Gannon. We can all understand there hesitation when it comes to dealing Trent out. I personally would like the man, just MO. We have 2 maybe really only 1 QB. We really have to thank Shotty for doing what he did with Gannon. How could he know, but obviously the memory isn't so short. They're not about to hand us a Gannon type QB anytime soon. So trade the man to .....whereeverland and we can trade from there. To hell with the Chiefs, sucks to be you.......scardy cats!!
__________________
Kiss my a$$ I'm a Raiders fan! Cheers LadysRaiders |
|
|||||||||||
|
This is just about the worst draft story i've ever read. It's pulled to peices on PFT.
It's riddled with inconsistencies and makes no sense at all. Clayton clearly has no contacts in Oaktown. |
|
|||||||||||
|
im not buying it yet, our team goes into the draft looking at experienced qb with major knee surgury. hes not ready to even play yet. the whole season falls on culpepper whether he gets hurt or not. bad move. forget pepper, one mistake behind the line and hes out again and career may be over.
|
|
||||||||||||
|
This is so lame..why do these so called draft experts think the raiders have to get a QB before they draft CJ?? I mean if the raider take CJ what will happen..most likely trent green will get traded to the fins.. causing culpepper to be released. If they falls through detriot will most likely be interested in still trading Mcown. The raiders could take edwards or stanton in round 2. WHY IS IT SO IMPORTANT THEY GET A QB BEFORE THEY PICK CJ? WILL ALL THE QB'S FALL OFF THE MAP ONCE OAKLAND SELECTS HIM??? getting a qb NOW has no bearing on weither the raider select CJ or not thats just plain stupid.
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|