
Originally Posted by
Live.B.A.Raida
I rarely jump in to other folks "e-beef," but the way some of you posters follow NoClaps around in to every thread he replies in are on the brink of harassement. In real life this is illegal. It's actually gotten to the point to where, to me, it's pretty disturbing and making this great FAN based message board less and less enjoyable. Who cares what his preference is. Some of you are really mad at this guy because he doesn't like Palmer? wow... build a bridge and get over it. Just like everyone else is, has, or will if Palmer remains as the QB. What is it really to you? Or are you that sensitive?
Back to the topic: Raiders are kind of stuck in a no win with Palmer. Facts are he eats up a large sum of the cap room and even if we cut him he will still be a financial burden for a while. As far as his play, he is what he is at this point in his career, very average. People clamored last season, even when we were winning, for a QB that could elevate the teams play. Well, Palmer does not do that. I know I know, "Palmer doesn't play defense, Palmer doesn't drop passes, Palmer doesn't block for himself." We need improvement all the way around, and everyone pretty much agrees that every other player with a premium salary needs to go during this rebuild (Seymour [gone], McClain [all but gone], DHB, Kelly, Huff, etc), but when it comes to Palmer he should stay. Why? We're not going to be good for a few more years, so why hold on to a player that will likely not be a part of the team when we become relevant again? And please do not give me the excuse "we need to at least look decent or else RM and DA will be gone." No, they won't. If last season showed me anything it was that MD is going to allow the RM and DA experiment to play out the length of their contracts.
If we're looking at another 3-5 win season does it really matter if we do it with Palmer? Will that 3-5 win total look that much better to folks because we had Palmer under center?
Bookmarks