
Originally Posted by
Sardonicus
You would think they don't need motivation when they're making the money they're making (I sure as hell wouldn't), but the league is littered with players just collecting a paycheck while going through the motions. Haynesworth is probably the best example of this, but even within our own team: Russell. The guy even failed at "becoming a better person" from that life coach or whatever that guy was that basically quit on him.
I would normally agree with you, but when these guys aren't making the money guys that were cut were making (Routt, Wimbley) and they're essentially playing for their futures, it's entirely conceivable (to me, anyway) that these guys aren't buying what Knapp's selling. These guys are human, and if they view their efforts as exercises in futility, they may shut down mentally and not even care. Not saying I agree with it and I'm hoping players like that get cut, but if Knapp and company stay and can't get the new guys to play their best, we haven't really accomplished anything by replacing the players and not the staff.
That's certainly plausable, however as Mile High alluded to, where's the personal accountability from the players? If what you say is true that some guys aren't buying into the system then those guys should be replaced its that simple. The days of keeping poorly motivated unproductive personnel are over... time to cut their losses and find players that are motivated.
"You can't Appoint, Hire, or Declare Leadership" ~ Sonny Barger
"Al Davis thought all owners were dilettantes with a new toy. He said to me many times through the years that owners are often the problem with their franchises, that too many of them think they can run things when they cannot, and the teams that succeed are the ones where the owner hires the best people he can and turns the game over to them."
Bookmarks