Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37
Like Tree31Likes

Thread: Raiders Ranked at "22" in NFL.com June Power Rankings

  1. #16
    dmauke's Avatar
    dmauke is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,322
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Jzero View Post
    lol... well, back in June of 2010 I said the Chiefs would be better than the Raiders and I received the same response. Right now I see 5 wins, maybe 6 for the Raiders.

  2. #17
    bleed4raiders's Avatar
    bleed4raiders is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Bernardino
    Posts
    2,625
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dmauke View Post
    lol... well, back in June of 2010 I said the Chiefs would be better than the Raiders and I received the same response. Right now I see 5 wins, maybe 6 for the Raiders.
    didn't you say that last year too??? go figure

  3. #18
    dmauke's Avatar
    dmauke is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,322
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bleed4raiders View Post
    didn't you say that last year too??? go figure
    I had them 7-9... give or take a game... I was close

  4. #19
    sil&blk's Avatar
    sil&blk is offline Limited Membership
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    592
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dmauke View Post
    I had them 7-9... give or take a game... I was close
    Soo you were wrong ? lol
    well your gonna be wrong again this year 9+ wins man. it must suck to be a fan like you. this might be the best team we've put in the field in 8 years and your predicting less wins than the last two years? explain please

  5. #20
    ottomatic1's Avatar
    ottomatic1 is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    willow springs raceway
    Posts
    3,163
    Blog Entries
    3
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    heres mine. means as much as theirs.

    1)Raiders
    2)Giants
    3)Packers
    4)Bears
    5)Texans
    6)Steelers
    7)Cowboys
    8)Eagles
    9)Falcons
    10)Redskins
    11)Panthers
    12)Lions
    13)Rams
    14)Ravens
    15)Jets
    16)Bills
    17)Bengals
    18)Saints
    19)Dolphins
    20)Colts
    21)Seahawks
    22)Titans
    23)Browns
    24)Vikings
    25)Bucs
    26)Cardinals
    27)Niners
    28)Jags
    29)Chargers
    30)Broncoes
    31)Chiefs
    32)Patriots

  6. #21
    Hawaiian Raider's Avatar
    Hawaiian Raider is offline
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Makakilo - "Da upper Ghettos"
    Posts
    15,752
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Of course, it's where you're ranked at the end of the season that counts the most.
    fckallr8drhtrz likes this.
    "Be on time, pay attention, and play like Hell when I tell you to" - John Madden's three and only rules.


    Mahalo Blackhole John

  7. #22
    RaiderInSD21's Avatar
    RaiderInSD21 is online now
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    5,400
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Eh, we finished 17th last year and I remember reading an ESPN ranking that had us at 24. I think we'll end up about middle of the pack again.

  8. #23
    superm's Avatar
    superm is offline Limited Membership
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Augusta Ga.
    Posts
    80
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dmauke View Post
    lol... well, back in June of 2010 I said the Chiefs would be better than the Raiders and I received the same response. Right now I see 5 wins, maybe 6 for the Raiders.
    Why does everyone think we will be under .500 this year. Do we not realize that we will not see that freakin predictable Al Davis defense ever again. To me with the talent we still have, that alone puts up above .500. Teams will not be able to pick us apart all game long. We finally have coaches that are allowed to coach. We will be the sleeper team that no one expects to be good. I'm predicting 9 or more wins. That's just my opinion
    ottomatic1 and themiamiraider like this.

  9. #24
    Palehorse's Avatar
    Palehorse is offline Limited Membership
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    558
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by superm View Post
    Why does everyone think we will be under .500 this year. Do we not realize that we will not see that freakin predictable Al Davis defense ever again. To me with the talent we still have, that alone puts up above .500. Teams will not be able to pick us apart all game long. We finally have coaches that are allowed to coach. We will be the sleeper team that no one expects to be good. I'm predicting 9 or more wins. That's just my opinion
    We have an extremely hard schedule and it might take a bit to get all this new stuff clicking smoothly. That said I definitely think we have the potential to pull off a great season. We just have to get going right away and never let up.
    ottomatic1 likes this.

  10. #25
    raidernationbmw's Avatar
    raidernationbmw is offline Limited Membership
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    357
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    This dmauke guy is a idiot why are you even a member here? go back to the Hargers forum everything he types is freaking stupid and doesn't make sense.

  11. #26
    NWTF's Avatar
    NWTF is offline Limited Membership
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lenexa, KS
    Posts
    3,082
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dmauke View Post
    l Right now I see 5 wins, maybe 6 for the Raiders.
    Its possible. I think they win more than that, but all 4 teams are not far apart from each other, so any one of the 4 could finish first or last fairly easily.


    Denver has the wildcard with Peyton Manning. If he stays healthy and plays like he did 3 years ago then well, they will separate from the pack. I don't think thats going to be the case. I think Manning will show flashes here and there, but I think its going to be his worst season statistically and worst season health wise. I think he will get hit early and often and probably wont play a full 16 games. New OC for first time in career, outdoors, cold weather, inconsistent below average pass blocking oline.

    Chargers. Not a bad team, but they will find a way to go 8-8 maybe 9-7. Norv will make sure they dont separate from the pack.

    KC has the last place schedule and IMO the best overall D in the division (at least going into the season). If Jammal Charles stays healthy, and their D doesnt regress they could win the division. When they won it in 2010 they AVERAGED close to 200 rushing ypg in their 10 wins. They also have the least chance to advance in the playoffs out of all 4 AFC west teams because they dont have a QB. There will be games Charles cant get going and they will loose those games.

    Oakland. I think there are a lot of similarities with KC. If McFadden stays healthy and our D improves ( It will) then we could easily win the division. But lets be realistic. Just like Manning probably wont make it an entire year neither will Mcfadden. He hasnt yet. But even if he doesnt that wont automatically eliminate us. Palmer and the WRs will improve as will the D. How much, I dont know. I think Dennis Allen really gets this team focused and disciplined and that will go far in keeping us in a position to win games that in the past we wouldnt be in.


    Its so early so I will take the safe route and say all 4 teams will finish between 7-9 and 10-6.
    dmauke likes this.

  12. #27
    -Tenebrous- is offline Banned
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,827
    Blog Entries
    5
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dmauke View Post
    lol... well, back in June of 2010 I said the Chiefs would be better than the Raiders and I received the same response. Right now I see 5 wins, maybe 6 for the Raiders.
    I agree - though maybe bump it up to 7 (or 6). Though, if the Raiders get bitten by injuries again, I expect this number to drop.
    dmauke likes this.

  13. #28
    NoClapsPlease is offline Banned
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    8,114
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by superm View Post
    Why does everyone think we will be under .500 this year. Do we not realize that we will not see that freakin predictable Al Davis defense ever again. To me with the talent we still have, that alone puts up above .500. Teams will not be able to pick us apart all game long. We finally have coaches that are allowed to coach. We will be the sleeper team that no one expects to be good. I'm predicting 9 or more wins. That's just my opinion
    bc you need experience and repetition to be good at something

    so even if the team is promising, it does not mean we are going to become world beaters

    we are going to struggle as our players gain experience in new philosophies on both sides of the ball
    R8rHead and dmauke like this.

  14. #29
    dmauke's Avatar
    dmauke is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,322
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sil&blk View Post
    Soo you were wrong ? lol
    well your gonna be wrong again this year 9+ wins man. it must suck to be a fan like you. this might be the best team we've put in the field in 8 years and your predicting less wins than the last two years? explain please
    Well, what I see is a total reconstruction in the organization from top to bottom. Basically you have a change in ownership, front office, coaching staff, and philosophies. Every process from top to bottom will change.

    Then you change both schemes entirely, and because of the salary cap issue it's going to take a few season's to change the talent to fit them. On top of that because of the salary cap issue there is very little depth abroad.

    It will take the team time to make all these adjustments. Then look at the schedule, it's not exactly about who the Raiders play, it's when and where. It's a difficult schedule.

    I think they will compete, but I feel that this is a transitional year and the record will reflect it. Not that they can't win over 8 games, I just wouldn't bet money on it happening. I'm hoping to see improvements in fundamentals, discipline, and effort. A change in culture regardless of the record is a huge step in the right direction.

  15. #30
    dmauke's Avatar
    dmauke is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    5,322
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by superm View Post
    Why does everyone think we will be under .500 this year. Do we not realize that we will not see that freakin predictable Al Davis defense ever again. To me with the talent we still have, that alone puts up above .500. Teams will not be able to pick us apart all game long. We finally have coaches that are allowed to coach. We will be the sleeper team that no one expects to be good. I'm predicting 9 or more wins. That's just my opinion
    It could happen, we've seen teams that change their culture do it before, I'm just not going to bet on it.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •