debate on McClain

**LaRaider2010** · 06-17-2012, 10:47 PM

Originally Posted by Mr Terrific

. Just waiting on an Als_Shadow post in this thread to make it complete.

Originally Posted by als_shadow

Anybody else notice the arguing style of Da Swami is similar to that of BramRaider?
I also think that Mr Terrific is in love with als_shadow.
But what do I know? And now, back to our movie: Santa Clause meets Abbott and Costello and gets eaten up by Godzilla in 2054.

And here it is, what took you so long Shadow?

Originally Posted by als_shadow

Exactly. So when are we going to sign Albert Haynesworth?
Today is Day 49 of the als_shadow boycott. Who is more worthy to be a Raider than Albert Haynesworth? Just sign the man!

He wont take a 2 year contract for vet minimum and contract terms about payment which protects the team. Oh and he wont play in 3-4 lineups. the 3-4 is what we'd want the fat fukcer for anyway. It would be worth giving him a 3rd chance if he's sign for vet minimum but he'd never do that.

**LINQ** · 06-17-2012, 11:42 PM

Originally Posted by bleed4raiders

Originally Posted by Raidermofojeff

I've been thinking that, but still the NFL likes to take action regardless of a court verdict, or weather one exists.
I'm in the camp of " whatever Dennis and Reggie wish to do".

Time will tell!

I believe they intend to wait until after all the proceedings aswell

I think that is the right thing to do.

The league should be more concerned with fairness rather than discipline IMO.

**Mr Terrific** · 06-18-2012, 02:08 PM

Originally Posted by als_shadow

Anybody else notice the arguing style of Da Swami is similar to that of BramRaider?

I also think that Mr Terrific is in love with als_shadow.

But what do I know?

And now, back to our movie: Santa Clause meets Abbott and Costello and gets eaten up by Godzilla in 2054.

Right on cue, thanks Als, you complete me or I mean you complete this thread.

Great post by the way.

**djh_raider** · 06-18-2012, 02:47 PM

Originally Posted by Da Swami

The case you cited was brought but denied on demurrer.

I told you that you were confused but you kept going only to have your link prove me right. You said they could not bring the case and not that a challenge would have it denied. However, you kept arguing with me. The case you cited lists an affirmative defense in demurrer as to why it was denied.

That is what I said all along.

The case was brought but denied on common law grounds based on a successful defense in a demurrer.

I tried to make this distinction but I got riled having a novice tell me I didn't know what I was talking about. I tried to explain this to you. So is the widower out of luck? You didn't get much love since you were using this case to slander my country in an ignorant manner. I was clarifying for the benefit of the room and not insisting on "being right".

I already knew I was right and you were clouding things by claiming in America that what happened in O.J. was how the system worked.

I told you it was not but you kept going.

I don't appreciate having my country mocked like that.

Swami, I made a post about us being Raider fans. You are still crapping on about legal issues. You have misconstrued and are still representing what I said. To put it simply, I said that the OJ civil trial and its result cannot happen in Australia. I have proved it. You still cannot admit you were wrong in this regard and are trying to deflect (as you have done all the way through). People are not stupid. They see the facts. You provide Wiki links and a school site (that is wrong). I provide a PDF document from the Queesnland Law Reform Commission. But, nevermind. As we alll know reading through you comments, you are never wrong.

If you do not like your country being mocked then do not mock you country. That can be done in many ways. And you do it well. Better still, why not recognise that your country is a flawed as everywhere else. The reason the USA gets mocked by the rest of the world is they say they are #1. They are better than everyone else. Whereas everyone else outside of the USA sees the opposite.

It is not mocking. It is a reality and a fact. The USA is not immune to what is happening in the world. Look how the Euro crisis is affecting everywhere. Just the same, the rest of the world is affected by any data from the USA. It is a Global society. And that is what makes your "foreigner" comment disturbing.