Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 57

Thread: A lot of You Don't Get it you DONT Want to Draft Clausen or Mccoy and Here is Why

  1. #1
    speedkills's Avatar
    speedkills is offline
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    14,539
    Blog Entries
    2
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    A lot of You Don't Get it you DONT Want to Draft Clausen or Mccoy and Here is Why

    I keep seeing Clausen this and that or Mccoy

    We don't want to draft a QB and here is why. Raiders can't develop quarterbacks.

    When the last good qb you drafted was when the Beatles were the biggest band in the world (EG Stabler) you know you have problems. But, anyon we drafted since Wilson, Marinovich, Walter, Russell, Hobert, Tui, have been total bums. Some of thi had to do with Davis reaching, but mostly because of the unstable coaching situation we can not develop a QB. Our successes during that time Plunkett, VInce Evans (as a backup), Hos, George for at least 1997, Gannon, Even Kerry COllins had statistically two good years in 2004-2005 and Grad last year were ALL Veteran free agents. 40 years of this is a TREND!!

    I think Clausen is going to be a good NFL QB, but NOT for us. We have no patience to develop a QB. We are better off going OT and DT rounds 2 and 3 and then trading for Campbell or goign with Gradkowski. Don't think that this time is different when drafting a QB we won't be able to develop one of these guys. Go for the trenches and hope that Campbell or Grad pan out at QB.
    "Darth Vader is a punk compared to Al Davis," Hunter S Thompson

  2. #2
    silverNblack520 is offline Limited Membership
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    239
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    so you want us to take chances with career back ups and terrible offensive coaches

  3. #3
    tonjappr's Avatar
    tonjappr is offline
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Antioch
    Posts
    979
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    we have one of the best qb coaches...i think clausen will be just fine with us.

  4. #4
    silverNblack520 is offline Limited Membership
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    239
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tonjappr View Post
    we have one of the best qb coaches...i think clausen will be just fine with us.
    im just saying our scheme isnt the greatest imo career back ups wont succeed in it we need a freaking franchise qb

  5. #5
    speedkills's Avatar
    speedkills is offline
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    14,539
    Blog Entries
    2
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tonjappr View Post
    we have one of the best qb coaches...i think clausen will be just fine with us.
    UGHQ!!! See you just dont get it, there is always an excuse, or hope that it will pan out but it never does. It is like a larry king marriage destined to fail.

    lsat year we had fuking paul hackett who is an amazing QB coach (go see how gannon and joe montana rave about this guy) and it didn't help fat ass.

    Drafting a qb will just be a waste of time and money. 40 years people is a trend.
    "Darth Vader is a punk compared to Al Davis," Hunter S Thompson

  6. #6
    101proofRdrFan's Avatar
    101proofRdrFan is offline
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    911
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    You cant live in the past success with Stabler or all the tweeners that sucked. This is now! If you can grab a QB expected to go in the top ten in the 2nd its worth the risk. If we were to of taken Russell in the 2nd nobody would have lost a tear over it. Clausen has alot of upside for a 2nd round pick. Save all the negativity for midseason if need be cause a bad outlook now makes for a sh*ty year lol. We have all the patience in the world to develop a QB. Look how we cattered to the last one.

  7. #7
    silverNblack520 is offline Limited Membership
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    239
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 101proofRdrFan View Post
    You cant live in the past success with Stabler or all the tweeners that sucked. This is now! If you can grab a QB expected to go in the top ten in the 2nd its worth the risk. If we were to of taken Russell in the 2nd nobody would have lost a tear over it. Clausen has alot of upside for a 2nd round pick. Save all the negativity for midseason if need be cause a bad outlook now makes for a sh*ty year lol. We have all the patience in the world to develop a QB. Look how we cattered to the last one.
    agreed its 2010 and you need a franchise qb to get to the playoffs or have an insanely good d like the steelers jets ravens have which we obviously dont russell hasnt worked out but so what hes not clausen this is a business you take risk if clausen doesnt work we can start over again and plus we dont have a 1st round pick next year the good qbs will probably be gone

  8. #8
    S&Bmexico's Avatar
    S&Bmexico is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    mexico city
    Posts
    1,590
    Blog Entries
    1
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by speedkills View Post
    I keep seeing Clausen this and that or Mccoy

    We don't want to draft a QB and here is why. Raiders can't develop quarterbacks.

    When the last good qb you drafted was when the Beatles were the biggest band in the world (EG Stabler) you know you have problems. But, anyon we drafted since Wilson, Marinovich, Walter, Russell, Hobert, Tui, have been total bums. Some of thi had to do with Davis reaching, but mostly because of the unstable coaching situation we can not develop a QB. Our successes during that time Plunkett, VInce Evans (as a backup), Hos, George for at least 1997, Gannon, Even Kerry COllins had statistically two good years in 2004-2005 and Grad last year were ALL Veteran free agents. 40 years of this is a TREND!!

    I think Clausen is going to be a good NFL QB, but NOT for us. We have no patience to develop a QB. We are better off going OT and DT rounds 2 and 3 and then trading for Campbell or goign with Gradkowski. Don't think that this time is different when drafting a QB we won't be able to develop one of these guys. Go for the trenches and hope that Campbell or Grad pan out at QB.
    Sorry bro but I belive that this is totally unfair, first u need the talent to development and then u need to want it, and just because we have had sucess with vets QBs thats no reason to say that we cant do it, some of the QBs u mention that we drafted in the past dont have the talent or the skills to be NFL QBs, have a great arm dont mean that u can be a good QB, like Walter, and the others that it suppose to be very talented like Marinovich or Jbust just dont care about football only care about money Marinovich was a great college QB when he was no high and have the talent to be a NFL QB but he was a jukey, and Jbust have the same problem he had maybe the best team of the decade in his last year in LSU but when they lost a game and also lost the chance to fight for the championship was Russell's fault and he dont even cares about that, and then when he play against one of the worst D in the country (ND) in the sugar bowl and expose them just with his big arm I say that the 99% of this poor throws will be incomplete or interceptions in the NFL everybody say that I was a hatter but no this guy thinks that he can be the best just because have a big arm but he cant learn the most simple playbook in the league and dont want to be better that no the Raiders fault or the Al's fault thats the Jbust fault only the only fault Al and the Raiders have is to belive in this asshole and draft him because think that they can develovment but no matter if u have the best skills in the game if u dont want to sucess then no one can help u and this happend to Jbust and Marinovich

  9. #9
    Live.B.A.Raida's Avatar
    Live.B.A.Raida is offline Limited Membership
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tha Deep Side of East Oakland
    Posts
    4,400
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    LMAO, people still do not want to except the fact that Al is sticking with Jamarcus for now. Yes we all have come to a unanimous consensus that he has been nothing but a disappointment thus far, but for you all to keep putting all your hopes in to something that is not going to come true is becoming difficult to endure post after post! The writing has been on the wall all this time, but yet you folks are experiencing cognitive dissonance...

    McNabb?... nope
    Campbell?... nah
    Roethlisberger?... no
    Calusen?... not likely

  10. #10
    RAIDERMIKE47's Avatar
    RAIDERMIKE47 is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,268
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by speedkills View Post
    I keep seeing Clausen this and that or Mccoy

    We don't want to draft a QB and here is why. Raiders can't develop quarterbacks.

    When the last good qb you drafted was when the Beatles were the biggest band in the world (EG Stabler) you know you have problems. But, anyon we drafted since Wilson, Marinovich, Walter, Russell, Hobert, Tui, have been total bums. Some of thi had to do with Davis reaching, but mostly because of the unstable coaching situation we can not develop a QB. Our successes during that time Plunkett, VInce Evans (as a backup), Hos, George for at least 1997, Gannon, Even Kerry COllins had statistically two good years in 2004-2005 and Grad last year were ALL Veteran free agents. 40 years of this is a TREND!!

    I think Clausen is going to be a good NFL QB, but NOT for us. We have no patience to develop a QB. We are better off going OT and DT rounds 2 and 3 and then trading for Campbell or goign with Gradkowski. Don't think that this time is different when drafting a QB we won't be able to develop one of these guys. Go for the trenches and hope that Campbell or Grad pan out at QB.
    Really? Hobert and Walter were third round picks and Tui should have been a fifth round pick. We aren't the only team that can't develop third round quarterbacks.

    Here is the list of 3rd round quarterbacks that worked out in the past 20 years:

    Matt Schaub

    That's it! You can look it up if you don't believe me.

    Marinovich and Russell have serious personal issues. That is the reason for their failures.

  11. #11
    BoJack247's Avatar
    BoJack247 is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    OC
    Posts
    5,033
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by speedkills View Post
    I keep seeing Clausen this and that or Mccoy

    We don't want to draft a QB and here is why. Raiders can't develop quarterbacks.

    When the last good qb you drafted was when the Beatles were the biggest band in the world (EG Stabler) you know you have problems. But, anyon we drafted since Wilson, Marinovich, Walter, Russell, Hobert, Tui, have been total bums. Some of thi had to do with Davis reaching, but mostly because of the unstable coaching situation we can not develop a QB. Our successes during that time Plunkett, VInce Evans (as a backup), Hos, George for at least 1997, Gannon, Even Kerry COllins had statistically two good years in 2004-2005 and Grad last year were ALL Veteran free agents. 40 years of this is a TREND!!

    I think Clausen is going to be a good NFL QB, but NOT for us. We have no patience to develop a QB. We are better off going OT and DT rounds 2 and 3 and then trading for Campbell or goign with Gradkowski. Don't think that this time is different when drafting a QB we won't be able to develop one of these guys. Go for the trenches and hope that Campbell or Grad pan out at QB.
    i agree with you speedkills.

    if Clausen or McCoy is available at #39, the Raiders need to get on the phone and trade out of the pick and get an additional pick in the process...basically use the situation to their advantage.

    there are way too many quality players at positions of need to take a QB that will take a few years to groom. i don't think either Clausen or McCoy have what it takes to be the saviors of this franchise. i don't think Campbell has what it takes either. nice player, but isn't strong enough of a personality to be a good leader on a bad football team.

    OT Bruce Campbell, OG/RT John Jerry, OG/OT Vlad Ducasse, NT Cam Thomas, NT Linval Joseph, NT Terrance Cody would be better picks when the Raiders select.

    word is the Raiders like QB Mike Kafka from Northwestern who if people haven't seen play, has a style reminiscent of Rich Gannon. he or Joe Flacco clone John Skelton would be good pickups later on in the draft.

    my two cents.

  12. #12
    BoJack247's Avatar
    BoJack247 is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    OC
    Posts
    5,033
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Live.B.A.Raida View Post
    LMAO, people still do not want to except the fact that Al is sticking with Jamarcus for now. Yes we all have come to a unanimous consensus that he has been nothing but a disappointment thus far, but for you all to keep putting all your hopes in to something that is not going to come true is becoming difficult to endure post after post! The writing has been on the wall all this time, but yet you folks are experiencing cognitive dissonance...

    McNabb?... nope
    Campbell?... nah
    Roethlisberger?... no
    Calusen?... not likely
    word.

    all signs point to Al giving Jamarcus the upcoming season to prove his worth one last time. i personally think he's going to fail, but that's the whole reason why Bruce Gradkowski is on the roster....in case, and when Jamarcus falls on his face.

    next year is the year for QBs anyway....oh wait, we don't have a first round pick.

  13. #13
    Gawdzilla's Avatar
    Gawdzilla is offline Limited Membership
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,289
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I disagree, for two reasons:

    - We have a good QB coach now
    - Clausen is not raw and is not a one-trick pony

    It isn't so much that we can't develop QBs, but that we have a bad habit of doing the same thing with them that we do with WR's and such: just draft the dude with the biggest measureables (strongest arm, in this case), and pay no attention to whether he actually knows what the hell he is doing.

    Clausen is not one of those players. He has a decent arm, but the best part about him is that he is a smart, VERY accurate passer who fluently ran a pro-style offense, and who still performed well even with a very poor line. I think he could thrive here. I'm not saying that we HAVE to take him -- I feel fine letting Grads man the helm while we build up other areas -- but I do think that he will be a very good QB if we do take him.

    That said, I doubt that Clausen will be there for our 2nd pick anyway, I don't really care for any of the other QBs available, and it looks as if Cable is not looking to draft the QB position in any case . He was clearly aiming for the OL in the 1st round (he said specifically that he had Okung as his #1 pick), and so I believe that he will address the OT position in the 2nd. I suppose it is possible that he doesn't like the remaining OT's as 2nd-round picks and will get one in the 3rd instead, but somehow I don't think so.

  14. #14
    RaiderMac is offline Banned
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Orlando, Florida
    Posts
    5,665
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    We still have the same o-line/d-line from last year and anyone who's calling for a qb, well lets just say that the game is won in the trenches....


    LT: Henderson, LG: Gallery, C:Satele, RG: Carlisle, RT: Barnes

    Backups:

    C: Morris, RG: Rodd, RT: Pears/Walker


    LDE: Seymour, LDT: Kelly, RDT: Bryant, RDE: Shaughnessy

    Backups:

    LDE: Richardson, LDT: Cooper, RDT: Joseph, RDE: Gunheim



    Oh yea, we should defintely go for a qb. Give me a break, Al Davis is sticking with what he's got with Gradkowski, Russell, Frye & Boller. It's pointless in trying to convince anyone who's wanting Clausen or McCoy, neither fit what we're currently running as an offense. McCoy is a perfect fit for the west coast offense with the short passes and the accuracy he has. As for Clausen, the guy comes off as a child with a pouting problem while throwing players under the bus, no thanks.....


    OL/D-line need to be upgraded, plain & simple. We don't have solid starters and we don't have depth....

  15. #15
    Raidermofojeff's Avatar
    Raidermofojeff is offline Limited Membership
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tacoma Wa.
    Posts
    7,919
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Raiders + Clausen = Bust

    Raiders + Offensive line = Hope

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •