|
 |
|
 |
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,010
Location: Venice Beach, Ca
|
|
03-11-2010, 09:49 AM
|
|
Jamarcus' Wonderlick score
Hey, did anyone ever hear what Jamarcus' wonderlick score was? Got to be low!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,937
|
|
03-11-2010, 09:51 AM
|
|
I think it was average. Remember, JaMarcus is lazy and indifferent, not so much dumb.
__________________
Consecutive seasons with 11+ losses.
2003 4 -12
2004 5 -11
2005 4 -12
2006 2 -14
2007 4 -12 (NFL Record tied)
2008 5 -11 (NFL Record owned)
2009 5 -11 (NFL Record extended)
2010 0 - 0 (NFL Record dominated)?
The Media will show the Oakland Raiders some respect when the Oakland Raiders show the game of Football some respect.
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,393
Location: Good ol US of A
|
|
03-11-2010, 09:58 AM
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaRaider2010
Hey, did anyone ever hear what Jamarcus' wonderlick score was? Got to be low!!!!!!
|
Google did and it's average.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 703
Location: New Jersey
|
|
03-11-2010, 10:01 AM
|
|
Well this thread flopped.
|
|
|
|
Pro Bowler
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 841
|
|
03-11-2010, 10:09 AM
|
|
i think i remember it being pretty dang low... the kid is not too bright. obviously.
__________________
DRAFT A CRAZED LINEBACKER THAT LIKES TO HIT PEOPLE or Left Tackle!
THANK YOU AL FOR TAKING THAT "CRAZED LINEBACKER!"
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,968
Location: NorCal
|
|
03-11-2010, 10:10 AM
|
|
he scored a 24, which is not bad and higher than Gradkowski's 19. Like somebody already said, his biggest problem is work ethic and laziness not intelligence.
|
|
|
|
 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Raiderfans.net Member Sponsor Staff Columnist
Chairman of the Board
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 61,004
Location: I'm over here now!
|
|
03-11-2010, 10:38 AM
|
At this point, really, does it matter...
What happen to all this, "Welcome to Jamrock...," crap?
We all know who and what we are dealing with...
It is, what it is. 
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,010
Location: Venice Beach, Ca
|
|
03-11-2010, 10:39 AM
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Tre
Well this thread flopped.
|
Did it? I got my answer didnt I ? And to boot, found out he scored higher than Gradkowski, which is a little shocking. NFLN said 24 on the wonderlick is the average for Qb's in the league. Not all telling, but interesting enough.
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 18,161
Location: Alameda
|
|
03-11-2010, 10:48 AM
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaRaider2010
Hey, did anyone ever hear what Jamarcus' wonderlick score was? Got to be low!!!!!!
|
What was your wonderlick score? This info was available before we drafted this stiff. 
__________________
DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS!
TIME WILL TELL!
Raiderman, Hardcore, Skates,
Run-Run, "POPS", Sean Taylor #21,
Ernie Holmes #63, "Uppy" #63,
Dwight White #78, John Rauch,
Raider Joe, Wayman Tisdale,
Steve McNair, Jim Johnson, Chris Henry #15,
Gaines Adams, Mosi Tatupu,
Merlin Olsen, Jack Tatum #32
& Mohammad the Cat.
|
|
|
|
All-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 491
Location: Bay Area
|
|
03-11-2010, 11:08 AM
|
EFPLFP: Wonderlic Test
I got a 44 but was rushed.....only to find I had 40 seconds left when I finished...oops
__________________
Ted Nugent being interviewed by a British journalist.
The journalist asked, "What do you think the last thought is in the head of a deer before you shoot it? Is it, `Are you my friend?` or is it `Are you the one who killed my brother?'"
Nugent replied, "They aren't capable of that kind of thinking. All they care about is, 'What am I going to eat next, who am I going to screw next, and can I run fast enough to get away. They are very much like the French in that way."
|
|
|
|
 2003 Raiderfans.net Member Sponsor
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,959
Location: Seattle
|
|
03-11-2010, 11:15 AM
|
|
As stated earlier, 24 is the number.
I have taken the Wonderlic for work/interview... It's quite easy, when you evaluate the questions themselves, but more difficult when you add in the TIME factor. 50 q's in 12 minutes.
2 or 3 out of 5 questions (or so) are ridiculously simple.
-Something like what is the 18th letter of the alphabet.
1/5 would qualify as NOT HARD, but need to take a minute to calculate...
Such as: At a speed of 75 MPH, how long would it take you to drive 60 Miles? (Not hard at all, but you need to do a bit of math.)
And then, you do get ones that are somewhat hard. (usually dealing with Mathematics by the way.)
Now, I could come up with the right answer on 100% of the questions on the Wonderlic... But 12 minutes get's tougher than you think.
The NFL wants to see QB's not just answer right... They want to see you make a decision to "Pass" on working through the one that require lengthy work. (It's an aptitude and decision making test mixed).
I got a 36, and didn't even get a chance to read questions 39 through 50. I got two wrong from simply moving TOO fast through them (again time pressure)
I also was stupid and did not use the option to "Pass" on answering a question... which would have helped me get to at least 5-8 more Q's
Of the 12 minutes, I probably spent 5 or 6 minutes on answering 4 questions alone.
If I had passed on those, I would gotten significantly higher.
Wonderlic scores (in My opinion) should be judged like so:
SCORE RANGE:
40 to 50 (Well read, good math, very sharp... Don't go overboard and proclaim GENIUS.. It's not that kind of test)
25-39 Solid. Read's at a normal level, works through problems at a slightly above average or average pace.
15-24 interesting score. Not a kiss of death, but I would like to see if they got a lot WRONG or simply didn't get to them
10-14 Great concerns over the test takers comprehension and reading ability.
0-9 would suggest to me some sort of learning disability or severe lack of standard education.
Useful info?
__________________
--------------------------------
"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world s4its on everybody. Pretending it ain't s4it makes you an idiot, not an optimist."
Last edited by Towner13; 03-12-2010 at 09:20 AM.
|
|
|
|
 2003 Raiderfans.net Member Sponsor
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,959
Location: Seattle
|
|
03-11-2010, 11:24 AM
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XRamfan
EFPLFP: Wonderlic Test
I got a 44 but was rushed.....only to find I had 40 seconds left when I finished...oops
|
Good link... Thanks for posting.
I will tell you that this is not necessarily a perfect example.
The 9 question "sample peek" they give was completely devoid of the questions that go into ratios, return on investments, etc... Basically the general mathematics questions.
You would be surpised, but the "smarter" a guy is, the more likely they are to get hung up on those questions.
Why? Because they know they can answer it correctly. So they spend a full minute-thirty working it out.
The NFL wants to see EVERYONE, pass on that question. Come back to it at the end. (Hence why you see a guy like Steve Young with a 33. He is one smart Mo Fo. But the Wonderlic would suggest to an NFL team "Work with him to make snap judgements.")
NFL teams are able to get info on HOW the player answered the question, not just "right and wrong"
__________________
--------------------------------
"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world s4its on everybody. Pretending it ain't s4it makes you an idiot, not an optimist."
Last edited by Towner13; 03-11-2010 at 11:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,010
Location: Venice Beach, Ca
|
|
03-11-2010, 11:42 AM
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by XRamfan
EFPLFP: Wonderlic Test
I got a 44 but was rushed.....only to find I had 40 seconds left when I finished...oops
|
That test is B.S. I got a 50 and still had 35 seconds left. It cant be that easy.
|
|
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 647
Location: Toronto
|
|
03-11-2010, 12:22 PM
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by raider07
he scored a 24, which is not bad and higher than Gradkowski's 19. Like somebody already said, his biggest problem is work ethic and laziness not intelligence.
|
I would argue their is a difference between on and off field intelligence... hes the stupidest starting QB in the league I don't give a feck what a paper and pen test says.
|
|
|
|
Starter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 112
Location: 925
|
|
03-11-2010, 12:27 PM
|
|
This years scores for the top QB's. Sam Bradford 36, colt mccoy 25, J. Clausen 23, Tebow 22.
Some past QB's:
Drew Henson 42
Alex Smith 40
Eli Manning 39
Brian Griese 39
Tony Romo 37
Drew Bledsoe 36
Matt Leinart 35
Kellen Clemens 35
Tom Brady 33
Steve Young 33
John Beck 30
Philip Rivers 30
Troy Aikman 29
Brady Quinn 29
Drew Brees 28
Peyton Manning 28
Ryan Leaf 27
Ben Roethlisberger 25
Brett Favre 22
Notable Low Scores:
Tarvaris Jackson 19
Derek Anderson 19
Vince Young 16*
Dan Marino 15
Terry Bradshaw 15
Donovan McNabb 14
David Garrard 14
Kordell Stewart 13
Marcus Vick 11
Jeff George 10
Chris Leak 8**
* VY apparently scored a 6 on his first test, and he took the test a second time scoring a 16.
** Leak apparently decided to only answer 12 of 50 questions. Got 8 out of 12 right, but alas, 8 is his score.
From ninersnation.com ......they actually call it ninersnation?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:53 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
| |