I think the NFL would like to see the Jacksonville Jaguars move to LA.
There's a Q&A article in today's LA Times about the stadium that might be built in the City of Industry. (by way of ProFootballTalk.com)
An early score in the game of returning NFL to L.A. -- latimes.com
What I get from this is that the Raiders will not be the team that goes there. The article says that the developer, Ed Roski, wants to become a minority owner of the team that moves there, but he doesn't want to pay cash for his share. Instead, he wants to trade rights to develop land in the City of Industry for a share. Al Davis is not a real estate guy. So you're looking at 1 of the other minority owners of the Raiders trading his share for these development rights. Too complicated, too many moving pieces.
Somebody like Al Spanos, the real estate developer who owns the Bolts, will have an easier time doing a deal.
I think the NFL would like to see the Jacksonville Jaguars move to LA.
I think so too. They have a very hard time (even when the team has been extremely good over the past 3-4 years) selling out their stadium. They tarp off large sections of their stadium, and still cannot sell it out. It's too bad, but Florida has the Dolphins, the Faganeers, the Hurricanes, the Seminoles, the Gators, etc. The Jaguars just can't seem to cut it in Jacksonville.
-We stand as one Nation united, under the colors of Silver & Black-
myspace.com/dparaider
Dam I live right by City of Industry, I'm like 5 minutes away, that sucks !!! I would of gotten season tickets
The Jaguars and Chargers are the most likley to move.
As for Al not being into real estate, you're probably right, but I'm got this odd feeling that I've read somewhere about Al having financial dealings with a person involved in real estate.
This was back in the 70s/80s - only reason I can even recall it vaguely is because this guy was thought to have links with the mob.
Also got a vague recollection that Al broke off the relationship due to his battles with Pete Rozelle.
I'd have to find it.
It was somewhere in the book "Slick - the Life and Times of Al Davis."
Before you challenge the Raider Fans to sell out the Colisseum or say the locals don't support the team Please Read Raider187's extremely informative post: http://www.raiderfans.net/forum/oakl...ance-woes.html
I'm just wondering if Al will be able to keep the team. I asked that to Mcdonald and he thought he would since his entire business dealings are with the raiders so he puts all the money back into the team...but if Al is forced to sell or in a position where the team falls to Mark...that team is on the market and all bets are off...
Before you challenge the Raider Fans to sell out the Colisseum or say the locals don't support the team Please Read Raider187's extremely informative post: http://www.raiderfans.net/forum/oakl...ance-woes.html
Before you challenge the Raider Fans to sell out the Colisseum or say the locals don't support the team Please Read Raider187's extremely informative post: http://www.raiderfans.net/forum/oakl...ance-woes.html
I'm a million miles away from being a tax expert, but I'm wondering if maybe there is a way AL could somehow paper up a deal to sell the Raiders to Mark beforehand circumventing the inheritance tax........Interesting stuff.......
Another thing to consider is that Mark probably be inheriting somewhere between 51-67% of the team and not be liable for the entire 1 billion dallar value in taxes.......
Is it actually contractual that Mark would become managing general partner by Al's appointment? I'm guessing it is.........All that said, I think there is likely a way for the Raiders to remain in the Davis family.........Through selling more shares or what have you.......
Guess the Jaguars could move their but that would be one heck of a logistics problem for them and their opponents.
This is from a Tim Kawakami interview
Al Davis, after the cameras were off: “(Kiffin) conned me like he conned all you people” | Talking Points
-Q: I don’t think we’ve talked to you since last year when you sold a 20% stake to outside investors for the first time. Can you explain why you did that?
-DAVIS: You should’ve called me. The fact (is that it wasfor)… estate planning.
-Q: For Mark?
-DAVIS: Well, obviously.
In 2011, that rule comes back. You know it’s down to about 10% in 2010 or no estate tax and then I think in 2011 or 12, right in there, the estate comes back… you have to correct me, does it go back to about 48%?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks