Russell vs John Elway's #'s Early In Career...Why worry? - Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board - Where the Raider Nation lives!

Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board - Where the Raider Nation lives!

Raiderfans.net - Largest Oakland Raiders Fan Community on the NET!

   


Register

Reply

All-Pro

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 430
beau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond reputebeau has a reputation beyond repute
Quote  
07-02-2009, 08:05 AM
Russell vs John Elway's #'s Early In Career...Why worry?

I think that most would take John Elway as a rookie in a heartbeat...Is that safe to say? Just look at his 1st ten years in the NFL. Particularly the following stats....these are shocking....His TD to INT stats are nearly break even after 10 years (TD-158) (INT-157). Equally shocking is his completion percentage that averaged a dismal 54.4% over 10 seasons never once breaking 60% And then there is the all important QB rating. He averaged only 72.1% for his first 10 years only breaking 80% one time!
This is a hall of fame QB that anyone would take on their team in a second, no questions asked or critisizms made. Yet our guy, JR, can't get anyone off his back after 2 real seasons. Gimme a friggin break! Here are the facts!!

Here are JR's numbers after only 19 games. Compared to Elways 1st 10 years.

JR's QB rating 73.9% 72.1% (Elway's 1st 10 years)

JR's TD/INT Ratio 15/12 158/157

JR's Comp.% 53.9% 54.4%

JR's better already in 2 of 3 catagories and only .5% behind in the comp.%
I'll take that vs. a hall of fame QB for a start. Now remember these are JR's numbers after only 19 games vs. a hall of famers first 10 years in the league with alot of experience under his belt. Also remember JR came into the league on a team in dissaray and with a new coach each year with no stability. Also no receiving corp. to speak of, no Defense and a team rated nearly last in the league. Elway dealt with none of that. He had a top flight organization, players around him and coaching staff behind him. Remember that's what he wanted...demanded Baltimore trade him...

All things considered, I'd like to see the expert bashers at ESPN address these numbers and defend themselves on the bashing of the Raider's soon to be "top league QB in the near future"...Numbers don't lie...Eat that bashers!!!

Here is the link for Elways stats...

John Elway - Career Statistics

Here is the link for JR's stats...

JaMarcus Russell
Reply With Quote
beau is offlineReport Post
Sponsored Links
Advertisement

 
Veteran

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 566
Naphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond reputeNaphtali has a reputation beyond repute
Quote  
07-02-2009, 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beau View Post
I think that most would take John Elway as a rookie in a heartbeat...Is that safe to say? Just look at his 1st ten years in the NFL. Particularly the following stats....these are shocking....His TD to INT stats are nearly break even after 10 years (TD-158) (INT-157). Equally shocking is his completion percentage that averaged a dismal 54.4% over 10 seasons never once breaking 60% And then there is the all important QB rating. He averaged only 72.1% for his first 10 years only breaking 80% one time!
This is a hall of fame QB that anyone would take on their team in a second, no questions asked or critisizms made. Yet our guy, JR, can't get anyone off his back after 2 real seasons. Gimme a friggin break! Here are the facts!!

Here are JR's numbers after only 19 games. Compared to Elways 1st 10 years.

JR's QB rating 73.9% 72.1% (Elway's 1st 10 years)

JR's TD/INT Ratio 15/12 158/157

JR's Comp.% 53.9% 54.4%

JR's better already in 2 of 3 catagories and only .5% behind in the comp.%
I'll take that vs. a hall of fame QB for a start. Now remember these are JR's numbers after only 19 games vs. a hall of famers first 10 years in the league with alot of experience under his belt. Also remember JR came into the league on a team in dissaray and with a new coach each year with no stability. Also no receiving corp. to speak of, no Defense and a team rated nearly last in the league. Elway dealt with none of that. He had a top flight organization, players around him and coaching staff behind him. Remember that's what he wanted...demanded Baltimore trade him...

All things considered, I'd like to see the expert bashers at ESPN address these numbers and defend themselves on the bashing of the Raider's soon to be "top league QB in the near future"...Numbers don't lie...Eat that bashers!!!

Here is the link for Elways stats...

John Elway - Career Statistics

Here is the link for JR's stats...

JaMarcus Russell
I agree that Russell has gotten bashed unfairly byt media and his a lot of his own fans. No one seemed to care that Russell had no repore with his receivers until the last quarter of the year
Your right with this comparison, except a lot of Elway issues were because of coaching and scheme. He still got virtually a non super bowl team to the Super bowl multiple times
When Shannahan got Elway in the West coast he became much more profficent.
Jamarcus is special, but he doesn't look the part to must people. Lets face it everyone usually steryotypes a great smart QB as a Peyton Manning, or even Brady QUinn type.
Russell is different, he like a combination of Rothlessburger and Elway and his laid back, quiet firery attitude is perfect for this franchise, even if others don't realize it
Reply With Quote
Naphtali is offlineReport Post
Hall of Famer

JQNJRaider's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,121
JQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond reputeJQNJRaider has a reputation beyond repute
Location: Rutherford, NJ

Quote  
07-02-2009, 09:44 AM
Stats are good, but was Elway winning games? If the answer is yes, the we must understand that winning cures all. If Russell was winning games, he would most definitely be out of the spotlight.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADEEZ View Post
what truth??

Fact is NO ONE think Davis is perfect or the end all be all.
Reply With Quote
JQNJRaider is offlineReport Post
Chairman of the Board

HITMAN's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 31,844
Blog Entries: 10
HITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond reputeHITMAN has a reputation beyond repute
Location: Mount Sinai

Quote  
07-02-2009, 09:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beau View Post
I think that most would take John Elway as a rookie in a heartbeat...Is that safe to say? Just look at his 1st ten years in the NFL. Particularly the following stats....these are shocking....His TD to INT stats are nearly break even after 10 years (TD-158) (INT-157). Equally shocking is his completion percentage that averaged a dismal 54.4% over 10 seasons never once breaking 60% And then there is the all important QB rating. He averaged only 72.1% for his first 10 years only breaking 80% one time!
This is a hall of fame QB that anyone would take on their team in a second, no questions asked or critisizms made. Yet our guy, JR, can't get anyone off his back after 2 real seasons. Gimme a friggin break! Here are the facts!!

Here are JR's numbers after only 19 games. Compared to Elways 1st 10 years.

JR's QB rating 73.9% 72.1% (Elway's 1st 10 years)

JR's TD/INT Ratio 15/12 158/157

JR's Comp.% 53.9% 54.4%

JR's better already in 2 of 3 catagories and only .5% behind in the comp.%
I'll take that vs. a hall of fame QB for a start. Now remember these are JR's numbers after only 19 games vs. a hall of famers first 10 years in the league with alot of experience under his belt. Also remember JR came into the league on a team in dissaray and with a new coach each year with no stability. Also no receiving corp. to speak of, no Defense and a team rated nearly last in the league. Elway dealt with none of that. He had a top flight organization, players around him and coaching staff behind him. Remember that's what he wanted...demanded Baltimore trade him...

All things considered, I'd like to see the expert bashers at ESPN address these numbers and defend themselves on the bashing of the Raider's soon to be "top league QB in the near future"...Numbers don't lie...Eat that bashers!!!

Here is the link for Elways stats...

John Elway - Career Statistics

Here is the link for JR's stats...

JaMarcus Russell
The only numbers most of us care about is the wins and losses... stats are pretty much useless unless it produces wins... When Russell starts winning games at a steady clip then post those comparisons.
__________________
"You can't Appoint, Hire, or Declare Leadership" ~ Sonny Barger

"Al Davis thought all owners were dilettantes with a new toy. He said to me many times through the years that owners are often the problem with their franchises, that too many of them think they can run things when they cannot, and the teams that succeed are the ones where the owner hires the best people he can and turns the game over to them."
Reply With Quote
HITMAN is online nowReport Post
Hall of Famer

HitStick's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,979
HitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond reputeHitStick has a reputation beyond repute
Quote  
07-02-2009, 10:42 AM
Why worry!?

We can worry because Russell will never ever be a John Elway.
__________________
Consecutive seasons with 11+ losses....and counting...

2003 4 -12
2004 5 -11
2005 4 -12
2006 2 -14
2007 4 -12
2008 5 -11
2009 5 -11
2010 ?????
Reply With Quote
HitStick is offlineReport Post
Hall of Famer

SF Mikey's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,507
SF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond reputeSF Mikey has a reputation beyond repute
Quote  
07-02-2009, 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beau View Post
Russell vs John Elway's #'s Early In Career...Why worry?
I think you'll find that today's QB stats are inflated compared to previous eras. The game has changed a lot since Elway was a rookie. The NFL have tilted the rule book towards the offense over the years which has helped to greately inflate QB rankings / ratings. Therefore, I don't think there is much relevance comparing stats from different eras.

Ultimately Russell's success will be calculated in wins / losses not any other meaningless stats.

I think there is a lot of truth in the following saying: There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
__________________
“Let me just say this,” Gannon said, “I tried to take the high road on that situation. It was unfortunate and it is what it is. I will say this: I really feel like the organization should care less about who is broadcasting the games and more about the product on the field and putting people in the stands."
“I think that’s the bottom line. I wish, certainly, the Raiders well. But it is frustrating to watch the team right now.”
Reply With Quote
SF Mikey is offlineReport Post
Hall of Famer

Noobstur's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,194
Noobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond reputeNoobstur has a reputation beyond repute
Location: Los Angeles

Quote  
07-02-2009, 11:28 AM
Just because Elway did it doesn't mean Russell will do it as well. But lets just hope.
Reply With Quote
Noobstur is offlineReport Post
Sponsored Links
Advertisement

 
Reply

Bookmarks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0