 |
Tuck rule |
 |

10-01-2005, 08:59 AM
|
 |
De-Cleater
is f'n real
2005 Member Sponsor Raiderfans.net official News Contributor
Hall of Famer
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 6,454
|
|
|
Tuck rule
since I have never postef in this forum I thought I would come up with a good question.....
What is the "tuck" rule?

__________________
 I'll be your Huckleberry
|

10-01-2005, 09:04 AM
|
|
CalPolyRaider
has no status.
Banned
Starter
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 128
|
|
|
When the arm is going forward, the ball must be tucked into the body of the QB before it can be considered a fumble.. i guess
|

10-01-2005, 09:06 AM
|
 |
De-Cleater
is f'n real
2005 Member Sponsor Raiderfans.net official News Contributor
Hall of Famer
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 6,454
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CalPolyRaider
When the arm is going forward, the ball must be tucked into the body of the QB before it can be considered a fumble.. i guess
|
I know I know....since we are all familiar with that rule I was trying to be funny in the football 101 forum,,,,,,,you know ask a stupid question.....I didnt phrase it to well
__________________
 I'll be your Huckleberry
|
 |
|
 |

10-01-2005, 09:13 AM
|
 |
WWWRAIDERFANSNET
has no status.
Banned
Pro Bowler
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 794
|
|
Take a look at this... http://www.raiders.com/uploads/photo...405woodson.jpg
This's an excellent picture of the infamous "Tuck Rule" play. It's currently on the Raiders.com homepage before. It's clearly shows the point of impact in which C.Wood hit Brady. The ball is not going forward. In fact, it shows Brady palming the ball with his left hand. Most notably like a pump fake. That picture clearly shows he was not in the process of making a forward pass when he was hit by C.Wood.
Two more things about that picture.
1. When that picture was taken, C.Wood helmet and shoulder were clearly up against Brady right shoulder blade and arm. That would have made it physically impossible to for Brady's arm to be going forward. With C.Wood where he was, there was no possible way that Brady could have even drawn his arm back to attempt a throw.
2. Look at C.Wood right arm and hand. It's raised and near Brady face. Had Brady arm been going forward, it would have run smack dab into C.Wood arm. Yet, the picture shows the ball clearly under the hand and close to Brady body.
Oh yea, I got one more thing is this.  YOU, COLEMAN!!!
|

10-01-2005, 10:08 AM
|
 |
WWWRAIDERFANSNET
has no status.
Banned
Pro Bowler
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 794
|
|
 What do you think about my analyzing about the Tuck Rule?
|

10-01-2005, 10:12 AM
|
|
CalPolyRaider
has no status.
Banned
Starter
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 128
|
|
|
Well during that play, Bradys arm was already going forward.. it was at the end of the pump fake, he put two hands on the ball.. then C-Wood hit him, ball comes out.. game over. Stupid Refs. See what you get when you ask a stupid question.. dammit de-cleater.. relivin bad memories
|

10-01-2005, 10:14 AM
|
 |
WWWRAIDERFANSNET
has no status.
Banned
Pro Bowler
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 794
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CalPolyRaider
Well during that play, Bradys arm was already going forward.. it was at the end of the pump fake, he put two hands on the ball.. then C-Wood hit him, ball comes out.. game over. Stupid Refs. See what you get when you ask a stupid question.. dammit de-cleater.. relivin bad memories
|
Yes, I'll never forgive about the Tuck Rule until we win the Super Bowl then I don't care about the Tuck Rule anymore.
|

10-01-2005, 10:16 AM
|
 |
VaRayder
has no status.
Hall of Famer
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leesburg, Va
Posts: 4,273
|
|
I can't get into this conversation.... I get too fuccing angry!!!!! 
__________________
Quote:
Not as lean
Not as mean
but still a Marine!
|
|

10-01-2005, 11:53 PM
|
 |
MasterShake2388
has no status.
Chairman of the Board
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Miami Hurricanes, FL
Posts: 23,534
|
|
|
Tuck Rule =
a BS rule that says if a QBs arm is motion as if he is throwing the football and he fumbles the ball it is considered an incomplete pass, basically if a QB runs around pump faking he can never fumble.
the worst part of this rule is the part that allows the QB time to tuck the ball in, if the QB is in the process of tucking the ball and the ball comes lose it is not considered a fumble, the dumb refs of the tuck game used that to cheat us out of a playoff advancement.
If the football is drawed back before the QB attempts to pass the football, and is knocked lose.. it is a fumble (see Steve Mcnairs fumble before he got injured)
this is another prime example of why Paul T is the Cancer of the NFL, another rule that rewards the Patriots for there wrong doings, another rule would be the new 5 yard rule.
__________________
|

10-02-2005, 12:59 AM
|
 |
raiderman12
has no status.
Hall of Famer
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wenatchee Wa
Posts: 1,505
|
|
|
It should be called the gaytriots rule
|

10-04-2005, 12:29 PM
|
 |
RaiderBeast
is part of Raider Nation 4Life
Hall of Famer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,624
|
|
I was at the Tuck game.. The whole stadium KNEW it was a FUMBLE.. I froze my ass off for us to get robbed by the ref.. BS Rule and call, even after the game Brady said on tv here he fumbled. All Patriots and their fans can stick that call up their @sses!! 
__________________
"Boxers play a very tough game, but it's a game - A fight is anything goes."
-Rickson Gracie
|

10-04-2005, 02:58 PM
|
 |
Raider_Len
is looking forward to a fresh start!
Hall of Famer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Novato, Ca. (North Bay Area)
Posts: 4,108
|
|
|
The reality is that anyone who knows football, knows that the Pats have two legit Superbowls, not three. No need for an *. Everyone saw it, including Pats fans, they know.
__________________
Proud father of a US Marine
Semper Fi
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokeinrichmond
I just hope the Raiders win a sup | | | |