Quote:
|
why dont we use the 46 defense?
|
a lot of teams run parts of the 46 at times.
defense is more of a concept thing than just the front and coverage they line up...the main concept of the 46 has a nose tackle over center and two tackles over the guards, which ties up the 3 interior linemen. the pats ran that front a lot when they had teddy washington, it came out of a double eagle front. anyway the middle of the line is pretty much clogged up.
it's a 3-man secondary, a deep safety and 2 corners who as someone else said are generally in tight coverage.
generally the tackles are uncovered, but the elephant end lines up outside the weakside tackle and is a pure pass rusher, and the tight end is shaded by two defenders, a defensive end and a linebacker/safety who usually is only responsible for taking the TE out of the play.
from there you can have the 2 LBs lined up anywhere behind the line and responsible for covering 2 backs.
so you have a 5-man rush in base and 5 defenders in coverage and 1 free man. but there's always the threat for an 8-man all-out blitz.
it's not so much blitzing but it's just a basic fact of having more defenders than blockers as he said,
Quote:
|
The main priority of the "46" defense is to create mismatches by which the defense has more pass rushers than the offense has blockers. This usually allows someone to come free very early in the play to disrupt the offensive game plan.
|
most of the time a team is in a true 46 they'll only send one blitzer - but presnap, the offense has to account for everyone.
the main reason no one can run a true 46 all the time is just that everyone runs spread offenses now - all you have to do it split out an extra WR, and then a LB is forced to leave the box, and you end up with something like a 6-1. and with the 3 linemen in tight you can widen the line splits to open them up and run all kinds of traps at them, esp. if there's only one linebacker left.
but as i said many teams use the concepts - covering the center and 2 guards, crowding the line with potential blitzers, etc.