Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: I want Jake Long, but Vernon Gholston would be the BPA at a need position

  1. #16
    kennyrat923's Avatar
    kennyrat923 is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    ATLANTA
    Posts
    7,121
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Juddzilla View Post
    The only scenario in which I could see Gholston as the pick would be if the team is planning to either trade Burgess (possible) or to let him walk after this year (more than probable). In either of those cases, then you have this kid on board as an immediate or eventual replacement on the D.
    You know I've been thinking that same thing. I mean we franchised ASO, gave Kelly some bread as well as Fargas but nothing for D Burg.


  2. #17
    OTF's Avatar
    OTF
    OTF is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Stockton
    Posts
    7,778
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BumpNRun View Post
    you compile alot of stats..... and do a ton of reading and put together a basis for who you would like the Raiders to pick.... But I wonder.....


    Have you even seen Gholston play???

    Did you see the BCS game??? He was pushed back out of every play.......
    Not true and I have already provided video to prove it. Furthermore if we are going to downgrade Gholston based upon the game against LSU then:
    1. we also have to downgrade Jake Long based upon his performance against Gholston.
    2. Clady also had a bad game at the end of the season so you have to count him out.
    3. Dorsey has leg, back and knee injuries so you have to count him out.


    You can always find a reason not to like someone and everyone has bad games.
    The better question is ‘what are the reasons I wouldn’t take this job.’ I mean, I’ll be here…yall won’t eat dinner tonight with all the reasons I have to take this job. Guys, this is where I came from. I’m back home now. I’m back home. - Reggie McKenzie

  3. #18
    R8Rshawn's Avatar
    R8Rshawn is offline Limited Membership
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hotlanta,GA.
    Posts
    361
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by OTF View Post
    Not true and I have already provided video to prove it. Furthermore if we are going to downgrade Gholston based upon the game against LSU then:
    1. we also have to downgrade Jake Long based upon his performance against Gholston.
    2. Clady also had a bad game at the end of the season so you have to count him out.
    3. Dorsey has leg, back and knee injuries so you have to count him out.


    You can always find a reason not to like someone and everyone has bad games.
    yeah maybe we shouldn't draft anybody.

  4. #19
    Anotharaiderfan is offline Banned
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    5,461
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Clady

  5. #20
    BayArea831's Avatar
    BayArea831 is offline Limited Membership
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tha yAy 408
    Posts
    3,416
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by OTF View Post
    Really? I watched the game and disagree! Below is a link to some of the highlights, while he didn't get a sack he did get consistent pressure. If he was able to get the same pressure in the NFL we would be in good shape. That means more turnovers because QBs would be forcing passes or throwing incompletion. Remember how good Brady was when he was pressured? Burgess & Gholston would make a great combo!

    YouTube - VERNON GHOLSTON - Ohio St. (BCS CG)

    Also go back and watch the Michigan game where he had a field day against Jake Long and the rest of their OLine. If Jake Long is the best OT then Gholston is for real; as not only was he fast enough to go around him but Gholston was stong enough to go through him.

    14 sacks in a season shows consistent pressure! Merriman was not as fast, strong, big or productive in college yet he was good enough to be DROY.
    I watched the whole game, and what I saw was Gholston giving up constantly on plays, and not making much of an impact in the run game if at all. As for him against Jake Long, that should come as expected, I mean Long has always had trouble with speed, most tackles in the NFL don't have that problem. Gholston is not the way to go. He is the next Kamerion Wimbley basically....

  6. #21
    OTF's Avatar
    OTF
    OTF is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Stockton
    Posts
    7,778
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BayArea831 View Post
    I watched the whole game, and what I saw was Gholston giving up constantly on plays, and not making much of an impact in the run game if at all. As for him against Jake Long, that should come as expected, I mean Long has always had trouble with speed, most tackles in the NFL don't have that problem. Gholston is not the way to go. He is the next Kamerion Wimbley basically....
    I watched the WHOLE game too! I specifically watched Gholston and did see him give up on a few plays but I also saw him forcing the QB to throw the ball away and make some bad throws. He may not be the way to go but every player can be picked apart, we have to take someone...
    The better question is ‘what are the reasons I wouldn’t take this job.’ I mean, I’ll be here…yall won’t eat dinner tonight with all the reasons I have to take this job. Guys, this is where I came from. I’m back home now. I’m back home. - Reggie McKenzie

  7. #22
    raiderHEAT's Avatar
    raiderHEAT is offline Limited Membership
    Pro Bowler
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    PHX, AZ
    Posts
    852
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I agree with Gholston as a pick at #4.
    Or we trade Jordan to Green Bay for KGB, draft McFadden first round. Best DT available in second round. Make some people nervous by adding some major new evil pieces to our puzzle.

    You had me at "whilst".
    LOL
    Thanks, man.

    Good read. I like that negative yardage when run at stat.


    -Heat



    Quote Originally Posted by Bram Raider View Post
    At the moment, our roster is beginning to take shape.

    The position where we appear weakest is currently at defensive end and with rumours of Kearse returning to the Titans as well as Antwan Odom, Justin Smith, Ebenezer Ekuban and Travis LaBoy all having been signed elsewhere, it leaves little in free agency that could still make a difference.

    In fact, the pickings are so slim that Al Wallace, who is nearly 34 might one of the best of those remaining, along with Marques Douglas, who has managed 17 sacks in the last 5 years of starting. Others include Josh Thomas (all of 6 sacks over 4 years) and Corey Smith (4.5 sacks over last two years).

    Given the position, its clearly a priority for the draft.


    Whilst we'd all like Chris Long, as much due to his Raider heritage as his skills, a more likely candidate to be available at number 4 is Vernon Gholston.

    Its possible to argue that number 4 would be a reach, but its a reach I'd rather take, than gambling on Ryan Clady, a player whom I've discussed elsewhere. Pass-rushers are a prized commodity in the NFL and Gholston's forte is getting to the QB.

    Here are a few snippets of whats been said about him:









    NFL Events: Combine Player Profiles - Vernon Gholston


    Vernon Gholston Scouting Report - 2008 NFL Draft Prospect









    Vernon Gholston, 2008 NFL Draft Prospect



    *Vernon Gholston, DE, Ohio State - 2008 NFL Draft Scout Profile, Powered by The SportsXchange


    Don't get hung up on this talk about him converting to OLB. He's best as a 4-3 Defensive End.

    Its a position of real need, so if Chris Long has gone, he'd be a great pick.
    In fact, if we want mainly a pass-rush from our DE, then Gholston might be better than Long - he has a quicker first step!

  8. #23
    #32 Allen's Avatar
    #32 Allen is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hall of Fame Bust Room in Canton
    Posts
    3,051
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    If we draft Gholston, I can see him whip Marcus McNeil's arse. And I would love every bit of it. I wouldnt mind to have him and call him Ghost cuz they come out of nowhere. He would be Rivers' biggest nightmare.
    When we're black, we're bad- Howie Long
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llLK99rjZ9A

  9. #24
    ULEN's Avatar
    ULEN is offline Banned
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Stockton CA
    Posts
    4,600
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I heard Vernon ran a 4.58 and recorded a 42" vert at Ohio State's Pro Day.

  10. #25
    Raiders Own You's Avatar
    Raiders Own You is offline
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    5,596
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ULEN View Post
    I heard Vernon ran a 4.58 and recorded a 42" vert at Ohio State's Pro Day.
    This is true... Those are crazy numbers for someone his size..

  11. #26
    cad's Avatar
    cad
    cad is offline
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,748
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    hes a talent thats for sure his burst is amazing
    Raider Nation, The Only Nation

  12. #27
    crizpynutz's Avatar
    crizpynutz is offline

    2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
    Raiderfans.net
    Member Sponsor
    Chairman of the Board
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    19,585
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    You know Bram, you made some very good points, but I think that you could create a new thread;

    I want Vernon Gholston, but Jake Long would be the BPA at a need position

    Who is our starting LT or RT? Nothing set as of now. I know you could write a post and provide tons of info supporting Jake Long just as well as you have in here for Gholston. I agree with your post here, and I think I would agree with the reverse of this post as well.

    That means, IMO, that DE and OT are our two most important needs by position right now and a case for Chris Long, Jake Long and Vernon Gholston could be made and it would be tough to disagree with any of the 3.

    Sig by Nexx

    You don't adjust. You just dominate.
    ~ R.I.P. Al Davis

  13. #28
    MT/Cali Raider's Avatar
    MT/Cali Raider is offline Limited Membership
    Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Big Sky Country
    Posts
    1,041
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    wouldn't mind him in silver and black but no way @ #4 period. it's just to high and i think we all have recent memories of REACHING to get someone higher than we should have i.e. Huff, Fabs, Brayton, D. Russell, etc. etc. trade down a few slots and pick him up along w/ either sweed or clady and i would be real happy. but a trade is pretty unlikely so i still say it Dorsey or J. Long.

  14. #29
    kyraider37's Avatar
    kyraider37 is offline
    Starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    193
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    To be honest, the only player at the top that blows me away is McFadden. Last year I wanted to trade down get more picks and take Quinn. I just felt that Quinn could be had cheaper and provide us with more ammunition via the picks and the drop off between him and Russell was negligible to me. This year I love McFadden but we don't need him. So, again, I hope we trade down especially this year considering the lack of a 3rd round pick and the fact that we could still get a couple of quality first rounders (if the trade partner has them). But if we keep the pick, Gholston would fill a need but I don't like converting college DEs to LBs. If you want a DE draft a real one or go with a DT. Go Raiders!!!!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •