Quote:
Originally Posted by jtagg7754
This is why I cannot debate w/ you. You're clearly bias towards Russell and you just said it in as many words. You do not understand more than me either. You want a potential piece rather than a solid piece of the puzzle. That is incorrect.
I'm not quitting on you. You're bias, I cannot debate w/ people who are bias. Sorry bout your luck.
|
Good job wavering(again)in the face of a challenge.
Your no bias act is a cop out of cowardice.
Not bias and realistic as a fan of sport, in which you have no control over. How does your view of reality count as being more realistic?
Your in over your head claiming to be a realist.
If your want to play the realist, i will be the anti-realist as i do believe.
Anti-realism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
|
Idealists are skeptics about the physical world, maintaining either: 1) that nothing exists outside the mind, or 2) that we would have no access to a mind-independent reality even if it may exist. Realists, in contrast, hold that perceptions or sense data are caused by mind-independent objects. But this introduces the possibility of another kind of skepticism: since our understanding of causality is that the same effect can be produced by multiple causes, there is a lack of determinacy about what one is really perceiving. A concrete example of a situation where an individual's sensory input might be caused by something other than what he thinks is causing it is the brain in a vat scenario.
|
Your not interesed in talking football so i will challenge your philosophical view of life.