Quote:
Originally Posted by MileHighRaider
Let's not forget about Bush. He has a habit of getting into the end zone too.
And our OL changed dramatically last year - yet improved just as dramatically. Cable has commented on the talent he sees in Kwame. I guess I'm willing to see how this plays out before calling him a bust in our system.
But isn't that why we added Tyvon Branch? I see him battling it out with Huff for that free safety spot. Best man wins. Might cause Huff to step up and be fantastic. Or perhaps Branch blows on by him. Either way, I'd be happy.
Again, we have Bush.
But McFadden won't be in there just on first downs. I could see us rotating frequently between the three, and/or presenting two back sets. More weapons on the field. Maybe we see McFadden on 1st at RB, then on 2nd at wing back with Fargas at RB, then on 3rd as a WR with Bush... who knows? Sure provides Kiffin and Company a lot of good options though.
 |
Don't let them confuse you.
The red zone problem was mostly due to the lack of a QB. They weren't afraid of McCown down there, they could key on Fargas, and Fargas is gutzy but not a TD machine. With the combo of JRuss and DMac, they won't know who to watch. If Bush is in there too... ;)
Cable is the guy who took us from Shell to Well ;)
He's a genius until he proves otherwise, and I just don't understand the naysayers on that one.
Don't let them confuse you again.
It's not Huff replacing Stu, it's Wilson replacing either Stu or Huff. It's a huge upgrade no matter who twists what I wrote.
You're right we could see some neat sets, but not too much in the beginning.
Frankly, plain vanilla with JR and DMac will beat the crap out of being creative with McCown and anyone from last year.