Thread: Offense VS Defense
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 11:50 AM
migman33's Avatar
migman33 migman33 is offline
Hall of Famer
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 5,897
migman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond reputemigman33 has a reputation beyond repute
Submit to Digg Submit to Reddit Submit to Furl Submit to Del.icio.us Submit to Spurl
Quote:
Originally Posted by lix333 View Post
the pick will be DMAC simply because that kind of player does not come around often. The draft will always have the VGs and Longs (both of them). We probably would be better off addressing the needs on Defence but we can always do that next year. There wont be a DMAC next year and im sure Kiffin wants to use him like Reggie bush. The future will be the combo of DMAC and M Bush much like USC used Lendale White and Reggie Bush.
The difference is DMC is not like RBush! The attemps tell me this. We are not gonna line DMC up at WR and throw to him! We might line him up at QB and let him have a run pass option! DMC will avg 20-25 carries right out of the gate, watch!!!!
__________________
"Defense wins championships, if the offense scores enough points"

Oakland Raiders 2008 Draft!

1st Rd Darren McFadden RB Ark
2nd Rd James Hardy WR IU
4th Rd Josh Barrett SS ASU
Reply With Quote