Who would you like to see at LB

**Napo** · 09-01-2005, 11:54 AM

With Irons starting now. Who would you prefer as our LB's
Please Post

Votes are public so everyone can see who you voted for

**Napo** · 09-01-2005, 11:58 AM

I voted for Morrison Clark Foremen

**MossNPorter** · 09-01-2005, 11:58 AM

Morrison Clark Foremen. by having irons and brayton in are they gonna be able to cover TEs

**OG BAMM BAMM** · 09-01-2005, 12:05 PM

I voted for Brayton, Clark, and Irons....I like having these huge LB's to intimindate the offense.....by having these huge LB's we should run nothing but different underneath zone coverages instead of running man defense..

**ra8der** · 09-01-2005, 12:19 PM

I think irons should take braytons spot if Foreman comes back. Clark better then Brayton IMO and Irons is better then Brayton. Maybe you guys disagree. Either way if Morrison is ready then Morrison/Irons Clark Foreman, Sorry brayton.

**onelove** · 09-01-2005, 12:22 PM

How many times are we going to vote on this subject. IRONS-CLARK-BRAYTON are the starting linebackers period!!!! Last week was the best the starting defense played. This will be the starting linebacker core when we play NE. Instead of everybody talking bad about the two OLB, lets support whoever Norv puts on the field. How many times do we have to discuss this topic.

**Napo** · 09-01-2005, 12:35 PM

Originally Posted by onelove

How many times are we going to vote on this subject. IRONS-CLARK-BRAYTON are the starting linebackers period!!!! Last week was the best the starting defense played. This will be the starting linebacker core when we play NE. Instead of everybody talking bad about the two OLB, lets support whoever Norv puts on the field. How many times do we have to discuss this topic.

How the fuuck am I not supporting Turner, and who is talking bad about the OLB????? Remenber this is a Poll for the members of RF.If you don't want to read my fuucking thread then don't and don't post

**onelove** · 09-01-2005, 12:45 PM

napo who are who to say I cannot express my opinion. If you got offended by what I said than screw you!!! You don't run this forum.

**MasterShake2388** · 09-01-2005, 12:48 PM

Originally Posted by onelove

napo who are who to say I cannot express my opinion. If you got offended by what I said than screw you!!! You don't run this forum.

if norv brought back ray buchanan and stuck him at LB would you support it?

as for the question
FOREMAN, CLARK, MORRISON thats how it should be, and thats how its gonna be I bet.

**Napo** · 09-01-2005, 12:51 PM

Originally Posted by onelove

napo who are who to say I cannot express my opinion. If you got offended by what I said than screw you!!! You don't run this forum.

Did I say I run this forum??? Your the one crying like a little girl about people talking back about our OLB. This is a POLL!!! Where people can vote who "they" would like to see as our LB's. We all support Turner. The Fuucking questions is what LB core would you prefer

**MasterShake2388** · 09-01-2005, 12:56 PM

if anyone doesnt think foreman should start, please explain.

**raiderArt** · 09-01-2005, 12:56 PM

i changed my mind again on this. I'll go with Irons, Clark, and Morrison.

I will probably change my mind again later tonight...

**silvernblack10** · 09-01-2005, 01:01 PM

Originally Posted by onelove

How many times are we going to vote on this subject. IRONS-CLARK-BRAYTON are the starting linebackers period!!!! Last week was the best the starting defense played. This will be the starting linebacker core when we play NE. Instead of everybody talking bad about the two OLB, lets support whoever Norv puts on the field. How many times do we have to discuss this topic.

Have we ever voted on this? I dont recall there ever being a POLL on 3 DIFFERENT LB's at once. Correct me if im wrong with a link...

**Napo** · 09-01-2005, 01:10 PM

Originally Posted by OG BAMM BAMM

I voted for Brayton, Clark, and Irons....I like having these huge LB's to intimindate the offense.....by having these huge LB's we should run nothing but different underneath zone coverages instead of running man defense..

Good point OG

**MasterShake2388** · 09-01-2005, 01:14 PM

Originally Posted by OG BAMM BAMM

I voted for Brayton, Clark, and Irons....I like having these huge LB's to intimindate the offense.....by having these huge LB's we should run nothing but different underneath zone coverages instead of running man defense..

yeah I agree, leave it up to gibson and stu to man cover the Backs and TEs
but IMO Irons ans Brayton arent the best run stoppers on the team either, I think Foreman is one of our best, and Morrison did a good job in college and if he really is stepping up his game he could be a better run stopper too and Morrison is adequete in Coverage he could be our best cover LB so my lineup would look like this
WLB Foreman
MLB Clark
SLB Morrison

leave foreman away from the TEs and let him work in open space, this way Gibson doesnt have to cover the TE as much as if we had a LB who was terrible at covering like Brayton, I would bring in Brayton and Irons on certain situations like goaline and 3rd and short, I like keepin' the more versitiles in the game it gives us more options.