|
|||||
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
|
|||||||||||
|
I believe that will be a tough promise to keep
Im not here to talk smack but I wanted to mention that it would be hard to do what you mentioned. The Raiders are in fact 45 million over. Yes they can cut and renegotiate but it will be reaal tough!
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: I believe that will be a tough promise to keep
[quote:c47833a38c="The Sowell Train"]Im not here to talk smack but I wanted to mention that it would be hard to do what you mentioned. The Raiders are in fact 45 million over. Yes they can cut and renegotiate but it will be reaal tough![/quote:c47833a38c]
read some of the other threads on the subject of the cap. The Raiders aren't really in bad shape. Russell accounts for 10 mil (he won't be back) and a good portion of the cap money is tied up in unguranteed monies, which makes renogiating a contract a lot easier. We will still have a very competitive team. Plus we'll have 2 1sts and 2 2nds again in the upcoming draft. we should be in fine shape.
__________________
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[quote:bebdd65895="The Sowell Train"]It still has to be tough with a 45 million cap.
And yes Russel has 10 mill but you still have to pay the guy something, its not like the 10 mil will fade away I believe.[/quote:bebdd65895] Don't have to pay him a dime. He's still suspended. And if he is reinstated by the league the Raiders will release him.
__________________
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[quote:90b6797bce="The Sowell Train"]It still has to be tough with a 45 million cap.
And yes Russel has 10 mill but you still have to pay the guy something, its not like the 10 mil will fade away I believe.[/quote:90b6797bce] Fade awayno disappear yes, we could pay him the league minimum or release him and pay him nothing. The Yets have 2/3 of the cap tied up in bonus money now thats cap problems down the line.
__________________
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Is that right?
[quote:3cbcbdf1ba]The Raiders are in fact 45 million over.[/quote:3cbcbdf1ba]
Where did you pull that number from? If Al Davis says the Raiders are $20 million over and Raider-Hater columnist says the Raiders are $50 million over, I'm not sure I am going to believe anyone till the NFL releases the cap figures next year. |
|
||||||||||||
|
[b:ee4113930a]2003 Strength Of Schedule[/b:ee4113930a]
Team Strength Of Schedule Cowboys.......................541 Eagles...........................541 Jets...............................541 Buccaneers....................539 Jaguars..........................537 Redskins........................537 Texans..........................533 Patriots..........................527 Titans............................524 Panthers........................524 Falcons..........................523 Giants...........................522 Saints............................520 Colts.............................518 Dolphins........................516 Bengals.........................508 Bills...............................504 Broncos.........................494 Chargers.......................486 [b:ee4113930a]Raiders.......................482[/b:ee4113930a] Bears............................480 Ravens..........................480 Browns..........................480 Vikings..........................478 Chiefs...........................475 Steelers........................473 Lions.............................473 Rams............................457 49ers............................451 Packers.........................449 Cardinals.......................443 Seahawks......................443 |
|
|||||||||||
|
Strength of scheduel doesnt mean anything.
in 99 people thought they had an easy win over the Rams on thier sched. This year people thought the Ravens were a 4-12 team. Every year suprise teams come out. |
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|