Raiders have nothing to worry about this weekend - Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board

Bulluck53 · #1 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 05:18 AM

I have been reading these ridiculous jet fan posts, and they havent backed up anything they have said. From an unbiased standpoint, the Raiders have a better team in all aspects of the game and the jet fans need to shut up because its gonna be a rough sunday for them.

JetFanNJ · #2 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 05:25 AM

[quote:a94c1febea="Bulluck53"]I have been reading these ridiculous jet fan posts, and they havent backed up anything they have said. From an unbiased standpoint, the Raiders have a better team in all aspects of the game and the jet fans need to shut up because its gonna be a rough sunday for them.[/quote:a94c1febea]

You should watch what you say because you're next on the hit list after we send the Raiders packing (retiring). That is if you can get my that pathetic looking Steelers team. A win is a win, but for God's sake that was a terrible game played by the Steelers.

BK · #3 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 05:33 AM

[quote:0d300010dd="Bulluck53"]I have been reading these ridiculous jet fan posts, and they havent backed up anything they have said. From an unbiased standpoint, the Raiders have a better team in all aspects of the game and the jet fans need to shut up because its gonna be a rough sunday for them.[/quote:0d300010dd]

Finally a voice of reason! Cool avatar, did you make that? Good luck against the squealers

85inthehall · #4 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 05:35 AM

he just doesn't want to have the Jets playing Tennesee

either way Tenn you will lose -- didn't the raiders already wipe their ass with the titans this year once?

NYJET4Ever · #5 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 07:38 AM

[quote:9d92564297="Bulluck53"]I have been reading these ridiculous jet fan posts, and they havent backed up anything they have said. From an unbiased standpoint, the Raiders have a better team in all aspects of the game and the jet fans need to shut up because its gonna be a rough sunday for them.[/quote:9d92564297]

I read that Jeffie Fischer was able to eat a good Dinner, and get a good night's sleep Sunday night after the Browns lost.

javdog2001 · #6 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 08:49 AM

[quote:fd5c4fe76a="JetFanNJ"][quote:fd5c4fe76a="Bulluck53"]I have been reading these ridiculous jet fan posts, and they havent backed up anything they have said. From an unbiased standpoint, the Raiders have a better team in all aspects of the game and the jet fans need to shut up because its gonna be a rough sunday for them.[/quote:fd5c4fe76a]

You should watch what you say because you're next on the hit list after we send the Raiders packing (retiring). That is if you can get my that pathetic looking Steelers team. A win is a win, but for God's sake that was a terrible game played by the Steelers.[/quote:fd5c4fe76a]

'Next on the hit list'???

Dude's been watching way too much Sopranos.

Raiderrooter · #7 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 09:25 AM

The AFC title game will be Raiders against Titans. Sorry Yet fans but you'll still be clinging to your memories of 1969 after this Sunday.

TommyGreen · #8 (**permalink**) 01-07-2003, 06:34 PM

AFC Title game... NY Jets vs Pittsburg Steelers. Steelers upset the overrated Titans... Titan and Raider fans collectively kiss the asses of Jet fans everywhere. 8)

RaiderBlitz · #9 (**permalink**) 01-08-2003, 02:25 AM

Look weeks ago we thought we would be playing the Jets. Miami was predictable on the road. NE stumbling and give you Yets the window to get in. Tenn is good and will be tougher the second go round for us but we will be home. The Yets would have to blow us out to convince me they could beat the Titians. Not going to happen. Come monday you can start a new list of what ifs.

DarthRaider · #10 (**permalink**) 01-08-2003, 03:07 AM

[quote:1a6745547c="TommyGreen"]AFC Title game... NY Jets vs Pittsburg Steelers. Steelers upset the overrated Titans... Titan and Raider fans collectively kiss the asses of Jet fans everywhere. 8)[/quote:1a6745547c]

Hey, whatever you're smokin can it be mailed??? The Yets and squealers??? [b:1a6745547c] LMAO[/b:1a6745547c] Best joke I've read in weeks...

**crizpynutz** · #11 (**permalink**) 01-08-2003, 03:17 AM

[quote:a2d84784aa="85inthehall"]he just doesn't want to have the Jets playing Tennesee

either way Tenn you will lose -- didn't the raiders already wipe their ass with the titans this year once?[/quote:a2d84784aa]

Yes, they did, and they beat up on the Steelers and beat the Jets as well. Hmmmmm....sounds like the Raiders are a perfect 3-0 versus all the remaining teams in the AFC. Why not make it 5-0, sounds like a good number to me.

DarthRaider · #12 (**permalink**) 01-08-2003, 04:03 AM

[quote:6644a4687e="crizpynutz"][quote:6644a4687e="85inthehall"]he just doesn't want to have the Jets playing Tennesee

either way Tenn you will lose -- didn't the raiders already wipe their ass with the titans this year once?[/quote:6644a4687e]

Yes, they did, and they beat up on the Steelers and beat the Jets as well. Hmmmmm....sounds like the Raiders are a perfect 3-0 versus all the remaining teams in the AFC. Why not make it 5-0, sounds like a good number to me.[/quote:6644a4687e]

Crizpy, I like this discussion board. It's a lot better than Bayarea.com. I should have come over here a long time ago. It's funny reading all these posts from Yets bandwagoners. I see Gannon and company putting on an offensive show on Sunday. And Pennington finally comes back to earth with 2, yes 2, INTs. The kid's good but his luck will run out again against the RAIDERS.

Tony · #13 (**permalink**) 01-08-2003, 04:08 AM

[quote:077d7295f2="Bulluck53"]I have been reading these ridiculous jet fan posts, and they havent backed up anything they have said. From an unbiased standpoint, the Raiders have a better team in all aspects of the game and the jet fans need to shut up because its gonna be a rough sunday for them.[/quote:077d7295f2]

I'll be remembering this, and you can be sure your face will be rubbed directly in it after the Jets send you all home crying.