Quote:
Originally Posted by raidernation200
I would take landry over Stu sorry but I would he is a much better tackler stu tackling skills are piss poor.
|
OK, so there were a few glaring missed tackles by Stu, but he was third on the team in tackles, so maybe he's not so bad. The bad angles everyone likes to talk about are because he was forced to go after a RB who he is not supposed to cover or even watch, or a WR who found a hole in our pathetic prevent and now he's forced to go from covering a zone to trying to catch a fast ass WR who split 2 or 3 other defenders before Stu. He is no probowler to be sure, but give the kid a break. If our run D was better, and we didn't play so much sorry prevent, he would not be put in those situations so often. Oh, and Huff did OK, agree he would be better if we swapped him and Stu around and Bing could have come in as relief (I know we got him for a LB but...)